It is so interesting how perspectives differ. Far from viewing hormones as some sort of goal, never mind Grail, I was fearful of them. The sources and types of emotions I experienced during this period are a separate topic in and of themselves. Getting to a decision on moving ahead with them was a matter of coming to terms with the necessity more than anything else. No doubt there will be some of that with procedures. I refuse to go there for now, as I find it … stabilizing … to keep a shorter-term view.
But let's cut to the chase on the suspicion.
First, the barest of facts. People experience gender issues out of a number of different root causes. Second, they manifest in a variety of different ways and in varying intensity. The formal medical diagnoses and terminology address only a narrow slice of this. That specifically includes "gender dysphoria." One issue is insufficient conclusive research in the physical sciences, although progress is being made. Another is that psychiatric/psychological theory is evolutionary and tends to perpetuate mixed concepts. (This last is a bit abstract. A good example is found in examining the roots of theories like AGP.)
It doesn't take more than a minute of rational thought to realize that comparing and ranking pain and treatment across different conditions is ridiculous. Take something like a relationship blowing up. It really doesn't matter whether it explodes because one party is transsexual, genderqueer, or something else, at least considering it from the perspective of the relationship destruction itself. it is destructive, excruciating, and often life-changing (good or bad.) A transsexual held back from transition might wind up destroying their life. It might be by suicide but as easily can be through substance abuse, from psychological fallout, or by other means. The same may be true of a gender variant person. Different triggers, different routes in getting there, but much the same endpoint. Anyone with gender dysphoria in its precise medical sense is at risk for this – by definition.
Part of the problem here is not just the concept of spectrum, but the conflation of spectrum concepts. Thus gender issues are perceived by many people as a single continuum of both gender problem and intensity. One result is non sequitur comparisons as it is then next to impossible to avoid the implications of a sliding scale. Therefore, the thinking goes, the transitioner suffers the same condition as the genderqueer at a greater intensity so minimally they are in a position of greater experience and knowledge, if not judged superior because of notions like gender purity and aspirational factors.
Consider another medical analogy. Patient A has a circulatory issue that has resulted in some bowel necrosis. For a variety of reasons, they are not a candidate for a resection. Treatment – colostomy. Patient B has a circulatory issue that has resulted in gangrene. Treatment – amputation of their right leg below the knee. Now give some thought as to how you would rank these two conditions. You might consider life impact, additional medical implications, impact on work or extracurricular activities, even personal views on different types of disability …. Your answers are going to say a lot more about you than the conditions themselves.
Back to the middle path. The so-called middle path is an appropriate avenue for several different types of gender issues. That is so BOTH because they are the best solution for some conditions AS WELL AS The fact that individuals vary, as do their ability and desire to self-sacrifice, bear pain, or even (considering another kind of possibility) their propensity to go overboard.
It is always fair to ask about the condition, its intensity, as well as about all those individual and complicating factors. The gist of my original response was to ask "where's the beef?" I still don't see much middle in this middle. Others reacted much the same way, but went on to ask about the detail. The only source of information are OP's posts. The primary context of this section is the transsexual condition. That, of necessity, often includes much discussion of various kinds of gender variation, and so the Q&A dug into that - not so much to challenge the OP's condition - but to come to terms with the proposed "middle path" solution, the tenuous and difficult nature of which is, after all, what the OP put out there! There should be no surprise that the perspective offered has a transsexual cast (but not necessarily bias) to it.