The total population of humanity is diverse. I think that has been established for some time. That diversity is based on many criteria, so what is normal is variable and changeable. But normal is an illusion unless it is considered to be the middle 67% of a "normal distribution" which is defined by graphing selected criteria rather than all possible criteria So, "normal" seems to be similar to "common" in some respects.
But does that mean all those on the wings of the bell-shaped curve automatically become abnormal? Not at all. They are just variations on the middle 67%. As many psychologists are beginning to recognize, thanks to the work of behavioral geneticists, "abnormal is normal" in that what is commonly thought of as abnormal is just that which is closer to the ends of a normal distribution curve. There are exceptions of course, but not many. One of the important aspects appears to be whether the behavior is detrimental to others. That brings in ethics and morals. And that gets really messy. But the fact is, with respect to our behavioral and psychological patterns, on the average, 50% of that behavior is either genetic or it has its roots in genetic. So, the diversity of humanity is largely due to genetics and not environment and learning. In short, some of us are necessarily different in ways that other people are not and there isn't much anyone can do about it.
Judy, you are as normal as could be except with regard to one criterion. You have the ability to put on women's clothing, makeup and all that and become a drop dead gorgeous woman. That is a gift! It is different, but it is not abnormal anymore than having an IQ of 200 is abnormal or, for that matter, and IQ of 50. But being different in one criterion that does absolutely no harm to anyone does not make someone abnormal. Anyone who thinks that is probably toxic and judgmental.