LeaP
03-26-2013, 04:29 PM
Having a bit too much time on my hands lately, I was recently musing over a positive response someone gave in a thread. For no particular reason, I found myself wondering why the comment was made in the form that it was.
It was short. it was supportive. It almost could have been "you go girl" - a phrase that is actually seldom used.
And that's when it hit me.
The TS members are often accused of being mean, depressed, serious, exclusive, etc. When these accusations come up, I usually respond by citing the positive things in the forum. No one ever responds to this, which always struck me as odd. The realization, triggered by that innocuous little comment mentioned above, was that positive things – the support itself – is what is being cast as mindless cheerleading!
In short, we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. It's a classic double bind.
The interesting thing about double binds, though, is not merely that they happen. It is why they happen and where they come from. Double binds are the product of conceptual frameworks that marginalize and invalidate people.
The subtlety here is how the marginalization takes place. The two mechanisms (broadly speaking) are denial and exclusion on one hand, and the subsuming of differences on the other. Both are in play in this case. In (the non-TS) fighting our legitimate expression of experiences, issues, and concerns, there is a strong element of denial. But the rationale is the promotion of the big happy transgender family. The TS know where the big transgender family thing goes ... the disappearance of TS issues and concerns.
But the last bit of the realization, coming out of the knowledge of so many types of marginalization in the world, is the underlying human dynamic: These others may be drawn to us. They may want or need us. But they do not like us.
It was short. it was supportive. It almost could have been "you go girl" - a phrase that is actually seldom used.
And that's when it hit me.
The TS members are often accused of being mean, depressed, serious, exclusive, etc. When these accusations come up, I usually respond by citing the positive things in the forum. No one ever responds to this, which always struck me as odd. The realization, triggered by that innocuous little comment mentioned above, was that positive things – the support itself – is what is being cast as mindless cheerleading!
In short, we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. It's a classic double bind.
The interesting thing about double binds, though, is not merely that they happen. It is why they happen and where they come from. Double binds are the product of conceptual frameworks that marginalize and invalidate people.
The subtlety here is how the marginalization takes place. The two mechanisms (broadly speaking) are denial and exclusion on one hand, and the subsuming of differences on the other. Both are in play in this case. In (the non-TS) fighting our legitimate expression of experiences, issues, and concerns, there is a strong element of denial. But the rationale is the promotion of the big happy transgender family. The TS know where the big transgender family thing goes ... the disappearance of TS issues and concerns.
But the last bit of the realization, coming out of the knowledge of so many types of marginalization in the world, is the underlying human dynamic: These others may be drawn to us. They may want or need us. But they do not like us.