celeste26
04-15-2014, 10:49 PM
"Spironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Bertram Pitt, M.D., Marc A. Pfeffer, M.D., Ph.D., Susan F. Assmann, Ph.D., Robin Boineau, M.D., Inder S. Anand, M.D., Brian Claggett, Ph.D., Nadine Clausell, M.D., Ph.D., Akshay S. Desai, M.D., M.P.H., Rafael Diaz, M.D., Jerome L. Fleg, M.D., Ivan Gordeev, M.D., Ph.D., Brian Harty, M.A., John F. Heitner, M.D., Christopher T. Kenwood, M.S., Eldrin F. Lewis, M.D., M.P.H., Eileen O'Meara, M.D., Jeffrey L. Probstfield, M.D., Tamaz Shaburishvili, M.D., Ph.D., Sanjiv J. Shah, M.D., Scott D. Solomon, M.D., Nancy K. Sweitzer, M.D., Ph.D., Song Yang, Ph.D., and Sonja M. McKinlay, Ph.D. for the TOPCAT Investigators
N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1383-1392April 10, 2014DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313731
Share:
Background
Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists improve the prognosis for patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We evaluated the effects of spironolactone in patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 3445 patients with symptomatic heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more to receive either spironolactone (15 to 45 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure.
Results
With a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary outcome occurred in 320 of 1722 patients in the spironolactone group (18.6%) and 351 of 1723 patients in the placebo group (20.4%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.04; P=0.14). Of the components of the primary outcome, only hospitalization for heart failure had a significantly lower incidence in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (206 patients [12.0%] vs. 245 patients [14.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99, P=0.04). Neither total deaths nor hospitalizations for any reason were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with increased serum creatinine levels and a doubling of the rate of hyperkalemia (18.7%, vs. 9.1% in the placebo group) but reduced hypokalemia. With frequent monitoring, there were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, a serum creatinine level of 3.0 mg per deciliter (265 μmol per liter) or higher, or dialysis.
Conclusions
In patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, treatment with spironolactone did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; TOPCAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.)
The content of this article does not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Supported by a contract from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (HHSN268200425207C)."
If Spiro was such a great a 'T' blocker why wouldn't all the heart patients suffer from low "T"? There is only about a 5% incidence of that particular side effect. That is 1 out of 20 patients who take it. And there are other worse side effects too. Check it out at www.drug.com
History tells us that the early TS patients those who started their journey before Spiro was developed only took large doses of Estrogen.
Bertram Pitt, M.D., Marc A. Pfeffer, M.D., Ph.D., Susan F. Assmann, Ph.D., Robin Boineau, M.D., Inder S. Anand, M.D., Brian Claggett, Ph.D., Nadine Clausell, M.D., Ph.D., Akshay S. Desai, M.D., M.P.H., Rafael Diaz, M.D., Jerome L. Fleg, M.D., Ivan Gordeev, M.D., Ph.D., Brian Harty, M.A., John F. Heitner, M.D., Christopher T. Kenwood, M.S., Eldrin F. Lewis, M.D., M.P.H., Eileen O'Meara, M.D., Jeffrey L. Probstfield, M.D., Tamaz Shaburishvili, M.D., Ph.D., Sanjiv J. Shah, M.D., Scott D. Solomon, M.D., Nancy K. Sweitzer, M.D., Ph.D., Song Yang, Ph.D., and Sonja M. McKinlay, Ph.D. for the TOPCAT Investigators
N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1383-1392April 10, 2014DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313731
Share:
Background
Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists improve the prognosis for patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We evaluated the effects of spironolactone in patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 3445 patients with symptomatic heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more to receive either spironolactone (15 to 45 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure.
Results
With a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary outcome occurred in 320 of 1722 patients in the spironolactone group (18.6%) and 351 of 1723 patients in the placebo group (20.4%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.04; P=0.14). Of the components of the primary outcome, only hospitalization for heart failure had a significantly lower incidence in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (206 patients [12.0%] vs. 245 patients [14.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99, P=0.04). Neither total deaths nor hospitalizations for any reason were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with increased serum creatinine levels and a doubling of the rate of hyperkalemia (18.7%, vs. 9.1% in the placebo group) but reduced hypokalemia. With frequent monitoring, there were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, a serum creatinine level of 3.0 mg per deciliter (265 μmol per liter) or higher, or dialysis.
Conclusions
In patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, treatment with spironolactone did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; TOPCAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.)
The content of this article does not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Supported by a contract from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (HHSN268200425207C)."
If Spiro was such a great a 'T' blocker why wouldn't all the heart patients suffer from low "T"? There is only about a 5% incidence of that particular side effect. That is 1 out of 20 patients who take it. And there are other worse side effects too. Check it out at www.drug.com
History tells us that the early TS patients those who started their journey before Spiro was developed only took large doses of Estrogen.