pamela7
08-12-2015, 07:10 AM
I have been pondering, madly or deeply perhaps, on why crossdressing seems to be the hardest to accept of the LGBT/other spectrum, and generally on the origins of much of our whole spectrum and the origins. So my hypothesis goes back to how civilisation lasted 5000+ years in stable commune-ist cities/towns throughout Turkey/middle east before the rise of palaces/temples from around 3000 bce. It goes like this: to remain in balance with nature, heterosexual activity was confined to procreation, and homosexual activity was for the majority of the time: everyone bisexual, and probably with complete freedom of partners, raising children communally.
If hetero marriage is one symbol of creating a control-domination hierarchy, so too is subjugating women as part of controlling access to sex. As the compensation for the loss, the women are allowed to look beautiful, the men are not. Therefore, in my opinion, the crossdressing is both affronting the only privilege left to women in a dominant patriarchy, and also challenging the dominance system itself. If this is true, then no wonder such aproby is associated.
So ladies, what think you of this?
xxx Pamela
If hetero marriage is one symbol of creating a control-domination hierarchy, so too is subjugating women as part of controlling access to sex. As the compensation for the loss, the women are allowed to look beautiful, the men are not. Therefore, in my opinion, the crossdressing is both affronting the only privilege left to women in a dominant patriarchy, and also challenging the dominance system itself. If this is true, then no wonder such aproby is associated.
So ladies, what think you of this?
xxx Pamela