Clare
03-24-2006, 12:32 AM
Hi all. Just wondering about hormones. Why is it some people get prescribed hormones by a Doctor/therapist, whilst others in similar circumstances don't?
The reason I ask this is because i've read of members who state they are on hormones for 2 years under medical supervision with no ultimate plan to transisition. After they've finished, they hope to have breast growth, fat re-distribution, softer skin, finer hair, etc..., but that's it.
Ok, I can see the reasons, but why are these peiople able to get treatment when others who appear to be in similar circumstances can't? I for example would take female hormones for the rest of my life even if I couldn't afford SRS (not that I plan to at this point in time). Yes, the most obvious attribute would be having breasts as a male, but otherwise the external physical effects of hormones are more subtle. Of course the biggest changes would be internal. Decreased sexual desires, sterility, in addition to the reasons listed in the previous paragraph. I'm told the most difficult aspect to deal with whilst on hormone treatment is the emotional side effects.
Anyways, the point i'm making is, if I go into a therapist and discuss the option of hormones, why is it that unless i'm committed to complete transition, the general medical opinion is to not issue hormones. Why is it if the Brain is transgendered, the body can't receive the hormone treatment to reflect the person's preferred gender status?
I know some people say 'ok it'd be great to be on hormones for a while to see what it's like' - i'm not talking about them, but those who'd be committed long term to medically supervised hormone treatment who may not ever transition (for whatever reason).
And me? I have yet to venture down the path of seeking hormone treatment, but this post is part of my research and i'm looking for constructive comments on my views. I don't want to get this wrong!
The reason I ask this is because i've read of members who state they are on hormones for 2 years under medical supervision with no ultimate plan to transisition. After they've finished, they hope to have breast growth, fat re-distribution, softer skin, finer hair, etc..., but that's it.
Ok, I can see the reasons, but why are these peiople able to get treatment when others who appear to be in similar circumstances can't? I for example would take female hormones for the rest of my life even if I couldn't afford SRS (not that I plan to at this point in time). Yes, the most obvious attribute would be having breasts as a male, but otherwise the external physical effects of hormones are more subtle. Of course the biggest changes would be internal. Decreased sexual desires, sterility, in addition to the reasons listed in the previous paragraph. I'm told the most difficult aspect to deal with whilst on hormone treatment is the emotional side effects.
Anyways, the point i'm making is, if I go into a therapist and discuss the option of hormones, why is it that unless i'm committed to complete transition, the general medical opinion is to not issue hormones. Why is it if the Brain is transgendered, the body can't receive the hormone treatment to reflect the person's preferred gender status?
I know some people say 'ok it'd be great to be on hormones for a while to see what it's like' - i'm not talking about them, but those who'd be committed long term to medically supervised hormone treatment who may not ever transition (for whatever reason).
And me? I have yet to venture down the path of seeking hormone treatment, but this post is part of my research and i'm looking for constructive comments on my views. I don't want to get this wrong!