Log in

View Full Version : Book review: She's Not The Man I Married



Calliope
03-13-2007, 05:46 PM
She's Not The Man I Married: My Life with a Transgender Husband
Helen Boyd
Seal Press (Avalon), 2007

For those just tuning in, Helen Boyd is a "tomboy" "feminist" who has been loving, and married to, an increasingly out, MtF transitioning transsexual.

Her first book (My Husband Betty: Love, Sex and Life with a Crossdresser), published in '03, had admirable spunk, invigorating a genre often dreary with predictable storylines and narrative solipsism. My Husband Betty was a wry, skeptical and loving critique of the MtF world, full of anecdotes, quotes and ideological bravado (such as taking Tri-Ess to task, for example). So far so good.

Since '03, the genre has smartened up.

The bestselling She's Not There, presented the standard angst-to-operation saga with unprecedented style - perhaps owing to authoresses' Jennifer Finney Bolen's big-time lit experience; Richard [Alice] Novic's Alice In Genderland defied convention by positing a nonop happy ending, told with glowing prose; while Chris Beam's Transparent went even further, offering a unique plotline (lesbian adopts street T-girl) told with an unassailable sense of drama.

Helen Boyd returns to a far more challenging milieu. Alas, she falls way short.

As Boyd notes, since the publication of her first book, she and Betty have been working the conference and workshop circuit - and I believe that's the problem. Panel presentations and university lectures have seemingly induced diplomacy, restraining her prior edge; no more dissing Virginia Prince. Understandable enough, but Boyd's concomitant absence of emotional volubility cripples the storytelling.

She's Not The Man I Married reads like a collection of seminar notes, padded to reach a publication length. The prose is arid, full of cliche ("necessity is the mother of invention," "fish out of water," "king's ransom," and so on) and most of her gender epiphanies offer stock axioms ("genitals are the least of it," etc.). When Boyd occasionally lights up a cool phrase ("frisson of stubble"), she cannot resist repeating it in the next chapter. Sigh.

So - what do we have here?

As Boyd perceives it, her marriage was supremely satisfying (at first) because, she, a masculine woman, and Betty, a feminine man, formed a unity of opposites in which all binary roles enjoyed a copacetic equal expression. But now, Boyd observes, Betty is taking the duality too far. As a feminist, Boyd cannot relate to Betty's "uberfemininity" (referring to Betty's brief infatuation with Britney Spears) while as a woman (however rough 'n tumble) she pines for the guy she fell in love with.

It's a hell of a dilemma.

And, too bad, it should have made a hell of a book.

Oh, well - not a total loss; Betty does look ravishing on the cover.

AmberTG
03-13-2007, 11:50 PM
I've actually never read any of the trans books, I have enough drama in my own life. I get depressed reading about other people's troubles.

Shelly R
03-14-2007, 12:45 AM
I was thinking about buying the book, not now. good heads up. Thanks

Siobhan Marie
03-14-2007, 09:46 AM
Calliope, thank you so much for posting that review. I've got My Husband Betty, which I found both informative and helpful and was going to buy the second book. After reading your review, I won't either.

:hugs: Anna Marie x

Calliope
03-14-2007, 03:10 PM
Don't mean to sound bummerish - please note my positive comments about other books in the genre.

Marlena Dahlstrom
03-14-2007, 03:38 PM
Personally, I thought it was a very good book -- but also s very different one from "My Husband Betty."

(Full disclosure: I was one of Helen's readers during the writing of the book.)

I'm checking in on my lunch hour, so I don't have time to get into details, but suffice to say, I heartily disagree with Calliope's take on it. Before deciding Shelly, you might also want to check out the reviews on Amazon and the review (http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P09EApsyf5m8ZUMBw8RBU0UL) that Erica_CD just added to her blog.

I do agree with the criticism that it is a bit repetitive, Helen was trying to illuminate things from various angles and that was one of the side-effects. But overall, I think the book has a lot of important things to say -- and from a perspective (an SO's) that's often overlooked.

BTW Amber, while the book obviously does touch the difficulties Helen and Betty face in making their marriage work, one of the inspiring things about the book is seeing the efforts they're both going to making things work.

Di
03-14-2007, 04:08 PM
I totally disagree with the review from Calliope. I thought the book was very good. It covers a very complex topic and she covered it well. It is part love story, part psychological discussion of the facts and and conclusions. I feel the book is powerful and well written.

Jenney Love
03-14-2007, 05:03 PM
Get the book, read it for yourself before judging it!

I found it to be an excellant read, made me think, which is what a good book should do.

It is not so much about being trangendered, as it is about gender and how we precieve it. It is a good read for anyone interested in understanding gender, not just CD's TS's or there spouses

There is no comparing it to MHB, as it is a very different book.

You can get a autographed copy from:

http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?page_id=1179

Jenney

Shelly R
03-15-2007, 05:43 PM
Alright, alright, I relent! I will read the book, I wanted to any way.

Sharon
03-15-2007, 09:47 PM
You can read the first pages of the book at the link below(Amazon -- click on the photo of the book):

http://www.amazon.com/Shes-Not-Man-Married-Transgender/dp/1580051936/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-0563711-7587353?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1174013088&sr=1-1

melissaK
03-16-2007, 09:06 AM
Wow. Well written, well justified original analysis, succinct - it has it all. My only thought is that it's a grad school level review, both in vocabulary and depth of analysis, and it is probably over the heads of most folks. But it's an A+ review.

And "pulease girls," a critical review doesn't mean you shouldn't read the book. Go read it and the other genre books, then reflect and compare your findings with the reviewers. Sit around with an espresso on a sunny balcony with a friend or two (or maybe with them present on your laptop) and discuss the book. Stretch your mind. "The uncontemplated life is not worth living" --Socrates

Hugs,
'lissa

Siobhan Marie
03-16-2007, 11:10 AM
Alright, alright, I relent! I will read the book, I wanted to any way.

Ok, ok me too.

:hugs: Anna Marie x

claireswife-gg
03-20-2007, 07:49 PM
The first book, MHB, wasn't really targeted at me. I'm not the spouse of a crossdresser, I'm the willing and happy spouse of a TS. I also have done all the research myself, so I really didn't learn anything. For the target audience though, there is a lot of support and validation information to be found within those pages.

I bought the second book (SNTMIM) as soon as it came out. It connected with me because I saw myself in a lot of Helen's description of growing up tomboy and punk. It was well written, and you can feel the pain in the balance they have achieved.

I personally am in a joyful relationship. I am enjoying watching Claire transition and am thrilled to be part of it. I am not, from what I've learned, a typical spouse. So this book for me was a bit sad, but I think it was a very valuable read. Everyone has to find their balance. In our case, we're both very comfortable with the marriage as is. Some couples need to find a middle ground, such as that found in SNTMIM or She's not there. Some marriages won't survive transition, and worse yet, some will find compelled to be cruel and use custody of children to hurt their transitioning spouses. So for most people, this book will show a way that a couple that loves each other can stay together with a compromise. If I said Claire had to choose between transition and our relationship, I know that she would choose the relationship, but would wither away inside. Not all couples can emulate every model of handling this.

I think Helen has written a good book. Yes, it is redundant sometimes, but I can tell you that writing about this from a spouse's point of view really requires coming from several angles.

My view on both books is that they're worth the read. Helen has done a good job with a tough subject.

EricaCD
03-20-2007, 09:27 PM
Well, as Marlena indicated you can read my review of the book on my blog. She gave the link above, which is just as well considering I don't know how to embed a link here. I'd copy it here but really, it's not hard to find.

Erica

MarieTS
03-20-2007, 09:36 PM
Calliope-- Thank you for your excellent review of Boyd's works. Although some in this forum may have opinions that differ from yours, no one can argue that your write-up isn't first class. In fact, better prose than the book!

Calliope
03-20-2007, 10:37 PM
Marie,

Thank you so much!

[blushing, smiling.]