Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueKat
Charlie may surf but charlie doesn't want to be let out. He always does something nuts at his parol hearings. I can recall a swastika/forehead incident.
I think the whole girly thing still has him down.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueKat
Charlie may surf but charlie doesn't want to be let out. He always does something nuts at his parol hearings. I can recall a swastika/forehead incident.
I think the whole girly thing still has him down.
No offense toward you intended, but I simply don't believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marina Twelve
I serious doubt that anyone will find evidence of that, because it simply doesn't happen. Whoever posted on that "Atlanta Weddings" page has a wild imagination.Quote:
The wedding thing is on the "Atlanta Weddings" bride page--I was just reporting it. And if anyone could find any evidence that it DOES happen.
Sometimes I wish I was dress as a girl. But never was. :sad:
I just want to thank everyone for the interesting comments! I have nothing to add, except again to note that during the Victorian era, it was apparently commonplace to dress boys under the age of about 3 in what looks to today's eye like girl's clothes. I don't know what to make of it.
:Angry3: :Angry3: :Angry3: :Angry3: :Angry3: Maybe only if you dress him and send him to the farthest most logging camp, I'm sure they will know what to do with him!Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueKat
When I was born, my 5 older sisters treated me like a living doll and dressed me in girl clothes, this continued until I was about age 5 when "Dear:evil: Daddy" put a stop to it because he didnt want his sone to turn into a "fairy"!
Didnt really understand that then because as a child of 5 I thought "fairies" were little peoples who did nice things for other peoples. I had no idea he thought I would turn out 'gay'.
But as for dressing in boy's in what look like girl clothes in the "Victorian era", well it was a diferent time and it might have been done because it was simply easier for changing diapers, potty training and maybe nobody actually made pants for little kids. just my thought...
You are correct---The boys were not actually dressed as girls, but as "infants" and "children" There were no distinctions in "infants and children's" clothing for boys or girls---they were just that-- INFANTS AND CHILDREN. The clothing was of ONE style for both girls and boys.---boys however would eventually "graduate" from skirts (breeching) when they got older, but girls never did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Connieminiskirts
This thread has turned into one big argument...it is now closed.