There is a significant difference, surely?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
danam
One disclaimer (of sorts): I read the line about Romance novels being female porn in an article somewhere (so it is not an original thought) and I found it to be deliciously provocative and fascinating...and I couldn't resist the tempation to throw it out there. The fact that it elicits such a strong response means that it holds some truth. As I said before, if it was complete nonsense, it would have been ignored!
Romance novels are surely fantasy - and having fantasies is not being unfaithful. Your dressing, however, is not just fantasy - it's also a physical reality?
Idealistic or not, you've made an EXCELLENT POINT, Reine!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ReineD
In my view, true happiness in a relationship happens when partners reach an EMOTIONAL INTIMACY
with one another by accepting the self and being honest with the Other, and by accepting the Other's honesty too. All partners sense when there is a lack of honesty in the relationship. And difficulties arise when two people seek different levels of intimacy (honesty) with one another.
But, maybe I am being idealistic.
:love:
Most of us r seeking the "emotional intimacy" u mention. Most probably never find it. And some that do, lose it!:doh: I did!
THAT is exactly what I miss when I CD, and in my life! There is No emotion or intimacy involved when I dress! Occassionally, it's just the PHYSICAL SEX that Danam mentions.
If SO's could REALLY understand that, maybe they would feel differently about some of our CDing? Or, do they resent a man having his little private fantasy in the shower, too? It's VERY much the same for me! Maybe for Danam and many others, also?