Hands on hips – masculine or feminine?
[SIZE="2"]Do you put your hands on your hips anymore? Men used to, but you don’t really see it much these days. Either that, or I’m not looking in the right places. I mean standing, both hands firmly attached to the hips. I would say placed rather than attached, but the former indicates effeminacy, while the latter reads masculine. Sorry, but I notice these subtleties of gesture all the time...
Nowadays you see men with their arms folded over their chest, legs apart (giving the “package” some room), exuding defensiveness or strength via body language. I know this because a young woman once educated me about this somewhat neglected form of human symbolism. What are you trying to tell me with your crossed arms? I’m a MAN? Just try to get by me? I enjoy beer? Hey, you tell me. I never cross my arms like this, mainly because I cross-dress! Get it? The other, similar, male gesture you see is the thumbs hooked into the pockets of the jeans (or belt loops if you’re more...rural), framing the belt buckle (how big is yours?) and/or package in a transparent display of male potency. I understand. You aren’t someone I can talk to about skirt lengths – have you ever met a fairy before? Gotcha...
When I went to art school, I engaged in displays of effeminacy at all times. Why? How? Well, if you stand at your easel, brush in hand, rendering the curvature of a breast, or the myriad features of a face, you usually place one hand on your hip for balance. You’re usually wearing an apron, too, and you’re surrounded by female students struggling with their own interpretations of the model. Everyone who hangs around, day in and day out, engaged in this artistic drudgery, will take on innocent gestures that look effeminate to the outside world simply by osmosis. You’re trying to keep from falling over, and effeminacy helps! I think you should embroider that saying and hang it on the wall! Your very being is in the balance...
Whenever I’m in the company of men, a rare event these days, I always cross my legs whilst standing, place one foot in front of the other, and put one hand on my hip, the other arm dangling at my side, or gesturing to enhance my speech. This tells the other "fellas," in a not too subtle manner, that I’m not one of them. Something is going on just below the surface, boys – can you guess what it is? Pardon me while I giggle...
:heehee:
Hands on hips may be more continental in origin, thus undesirable for American males. I can think of several examples in Art, such as Gainsborough’s “Blue Boy,” Donatello’s “David,” or Cezanne’s “Boy In A Red Waistcoat.” These boys are all approachable human beings, receptive to feelings, an intrinsically European characteristic, IMHO. Rembrandt did a self-portrait where he portrayed himself with both hands on his hips – a sensitive male, obviously, standing on a firm footing of hard-won experience, all obtained by the expression of deep human feeling...
My personal, more recent, hands-on-hips hero is Robert Plant, erstwhile vocalist of Led Zeppelin, depending on what the status of that group is at the moment. Anyway, there he was, in 1979, onstage at Knebworth, singing “Kashmir” to the gathered throng. It’s time for Jimmy Page’s guitar solo, so Mr. Plant withdraws to the rear, near the drum riser, hands on hips. He stands still, out of the spotlight, surrendering the stage to his male companion. I find this to be very moving, especially in these days of unnecessary rock choreography. Alas, this is a bygone era, and anything more continental, or emotional, or reserved in nature is frowned upon here in the land of pointless confrontation and excess...
With that in mind, I yield to my sisters. Do you think at all about body language, and what effeminacy you may or not be projecting to others? Where do you stand, or, more importantly, HOW do you stand? [/SIZE]
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar....
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tima
[SIZE="2"]That’s a bit harsh, don’t you think? We are the ones who are being discriminated against, and don’t forget it.[/SIZE]
My point is that the OP's post was discriminating against masculine men, the same type of discrimination that we may (or may not) experience at the hands of others. And in this case, we are not the group being discriminated against, it was one of us (the OP) doing the discriminating. Maybe Frederique didn't mean for her post to sound as negative as I perceived it to be, but it was. I am a transvestite, but I am also a manly man, and I don't like seeing either group discriminate against the other.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frederique
The men would have their hands in their pockets, jingling their change loudly, somewhere quite near the...well, you know. These men never crossed their arms, never put their hands on their hips, but the cacophony of clanking coins said it all in terms of gesture. Another thinly disguised male “comparison” ritual, usually accompanied by frequent unnecessary spitting. I didn’t want to be, but I was THERE...
I think that you're reading too much into the proximity of the penis to the front pockets in jeans. Putting your hands in your pockets makes it easy to relax, as your arms are supported by both your shoulders and your pants. It's a very natural stance; playing with the change in your pocket is a natural way to keep your hands busy, just like how some girls might play with their hair when bored. This is not a "thinly disguised comparison ritual."
As Freud would say, "Sometimes putting your hands in your pockets is just putting your hands in your pockets (and usually is)."
I'm not actually that arrogant... just that sarcastic.
Just to clear things up, the following was meant to be read as sarcasm (I thought that the smiley face communicated that, but I was obviously wrong):
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nick2Nikki
(Unfortunately, I'm the only one who's actually right. All the time.:tongueout)
Sorry for the confusion!