Age AND body appropriate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
terri_sandal
I understand some girls prefer a shorter skirt/dress but is it really a good look to take out ?
I'm in my 50s. There are two rules in my book and I adhere to them:
1) Neither the young nor old should wear minis unless they have the legs to sustain them. This means no cellulite (unless it is hidden with hose), no pudgy flabby legs, no varicose veins, no skin going south as the result of gravity, no thighs that jiggle while walking. Opaque leggings are OK since they hide a multitude of sins, but only if the body is weight proportionate.
2) The older the woman, the longer the hemline, irrespective of her legs. Styles that 20 year-olds wear look ridiculous on a middle aged woman, even if she has a great body. Here's a picture of what I mean: http://images3.chictopia.com/photos/...rd-pri_400.jpg.
The styles must not only match a woman's body, they look best if they also match the age reflected in her face else the whole effect leaves something to be desired. An inch or two above the knee is fine though.
That said, the above advice is for people who want to be seen at their best advantage and who want to maximize their attractiveness. Obviously if a person doesn't care, s/he can wear what s/he wants to.
I observe people a lot. And the vast majority of GGs that I see dress appropriately for their ages. There are people who champion individuality and personal freedom and of course it's a free worlds. But, I can't help but think that Kirsty Alley, for example, would have looked much better had she worn something else:
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...ASY-1YCSLGUlnE
http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/pc/K...Mg637X_afl.jpg
... and of course, anything goes in nightclubs. The above refers to being out and about in the mainstream.
:2c:
Edit - And this applies to men as well. I think this man would look better if he wore something else:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_gxhS2LZ8ML...20in%20speedos