Printable View
This is a poll for those of us who like to see MtF CD transformation pics, with or without the "added value" of panty flashing, stocking tops etc.
Bonus question: Why do you/do you not like seeing CD's showing a little extra?
My opinion: I love art, and artful porn, but there are few and far between who can pull it off. In the absence of art or artful porn, I would prefer to see CD's making a real effort to present themselves as GG's in the moste tasteful manner possible.
PLEASE POST A COMMENT!
There is a time and place for everything. In this forum I feel that we are trying to put a positive light on our CDing and offer a site where non Cds can get an idea what its all about. There are other sites that are available to titilate.
I see nothing wrong with a little stocking top showing if it's done in a tasteful manner.:hugs:
Angie
I wouldn't consider posting a pic without trying to look as much like a GG as I possibly can. That requires dressing to the "T" every time. Which I do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Anderson
I certainly don't expect everyone to do that. But u can certainly tell the CDs that try to present themselves as authentically and as stylishly as possible.
As u do, Em, I REALLY appreciate their pics! I KNOW the time and effort envolved is often tremendous!
So who's the 12 that voted they don't like it? you can't comment? bok bok bok...
I don't mind either way, I think on some it's very sexy and I won't name names, that would be unfair... I love seeing Tam in her little skirts and stockings... and as long as she and others are happy, who cares?
I'm one of the 12 who don't like it. My comment is in the original post. I can't vouch for the 11 others.
Ok, so why don't you like it Emily? your opinion isn't really an answer, there must be more to it?
I really don't mind either way...AS LONG...as it is tasteful. There are plenty of other sites where you can get an eyeful, if that is your desire. In this site I like the fact that members present themselves well.
The Moulin Rouge dancers made fortune out of flashing their Knickers
I glimpse here and ther does no harm at all :D
There's no more to it than what I consider an art form versus gratuitous vulgarity, or somewhere in between. It's all a question of personal taste.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
I don't mind one way or the other. This site is a cut above the others and we should keep it that way, but, being a huge fan of the classic pinup, there's nothing wrong with a bit of innocent, tastefully done, cheesecake.
I'll go with Jenni and Shelly on this one.
Jenni: Indeed, getting an eyeful can happen on thousands of sites... Not what I would consider classy.
Shelly: The Moulin Rouge is a favorite of mine. Knickers, yes, but it's more about the artistic "ensemble" than the thrill.
Funny I enjoy taking photos and I post a lot but I rarely go out seeking to view other CD's photos... I love looking at womens photos mainly photos of their makeup... Guess I'm always striving to better my self in that way and in some twisted way.. I'd rather spend my time looking at what I'm trying to emulate than a copy of what I'm tryng to emulate... Weird huh?
I just voted and I voted that I don't like to see "A little Extra".
I think many people on the Internet have the view that cross dressing is all about sex and a good deal of pornography. They reach this conclusion because of all of the pictures out there that are readily available showing cross dressers with their ******s hanging out, wet panties, or even in the sexual act.
It bothers me that due to this kind of stuff, many people are led to believe that this is what cross dressing is all about. This is not what I think it is all about and I dislike the way it represents us.
I don't like the panty/stocking top photos. Not just on this forum but anywhere. It does not offend me but it does look tacky.
For me -
Stockings are kind of tacky. I prefer pantyhose, and seeing stocking tops just ruins the look.
Panty - I wear them cause they are woman but I have no sexual thing about panties [I know I risk being banned for even saying such a thing]. Plus, as pretty as some CDs are, seeing her undies somehow reminds me it is a male underneath.
[SIZE=4]I rarely look at sites that promote any type of porn, I feel it is degrading to most women. When I look at pictures, I am trying to see how they did their makeup, hair and pose, not looking for odd panties, flashing of peticoats or anything like that. I never see real women showing such things. To me it is a male trait and is not that flattering. But that is just my opinion.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4]If your trip is simply to show something, fine. I personally appreciate those that actually emulate the feminine, not make fun of it.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4]Except for nipples that appear to be ready to burst through my top, I have never shown pictures of incomplete looks or what I feel don't really amount to anything, no real effort on their part.[/SIZE]
Wow... I'm surprised at some of the responses here, maybe it's your age.... as you get a bit older, you get more prudish :tongueout
:hiding:
My opinion why I don't care to see panties on CDs...
Well, if the picture is about flashing panties or stocking tops, then the picture is about sex. Tastefully done or not, it still comes down to titilating with sexual inclination.
I am not sexually interested in CDs, so don't care to see such pics.
I actually like to look at CDs pics to see how well they can appear female. Maybe more like a professional interest.
Then there IS the fact that it's hard enough for most of us to look like women, but then you throw in the aspect that they are trying to look sexy at the same time.... I don't know many men who can pull that off successfully (to my standards anyway).
Hugz, Lori
Or we've had SOOOOO much sex were tired of it? hahahaha I should have been a nun......Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
:lol: that much eh... lol.... :itsok:Quote:
Originally Posted by Karren Hutton
What? so CD's in magazines selling stockings and lingerie is all about sex then? :rolleyes: *shakes head* Isn't the point of flashing a bit of stocking top trying to be sexy and not about actual sex? Jeez... you'd have everyone in a nun outfit wouldn't you....Quote:
Originally Posted by Lori SC
Well I was going to show my one pair of panties but figured I would get the boot oh well I did show my slip:D
Married 32 years will do that...... :( SIGH.............Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
I know people who find the thought of a nun's outfit a lot sexier than any dress especially with matching underwear
LOL... not anymore... but slips? :eek: ah crap... I can't do the grandma thing no more... bah...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tina Dixon
:( try showing her a bit of stocking :heehee:Quote:
Originally Posted by Karren Hutton
Hmm... yeah nuns can be sexy too :devil: ooops... that should be an :angel:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelly Preston
<edit> I guess some would all have us wearing these then :rolleyes:
Attachment 68738
Interesting question. I don't really mind either way. However, I think a still photo showing stocking top or panties is extremely hard to get right without it looking gratuitous, unless it's a fashion shoot. I think the subject needs an air of not knowing what may be showing and the viewer needs a sense of seeing something no-one else has seen. So, subject, viewer and photographer all have to get it right before you get a great picture. Any image in the style of Cartier-Bresson springs to mind as examples of what I mean. As a part-time photographer I think I could struggle for years before I could capture such an image.
Sarah...
No.1. Are we talking about simple panties and stockings?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
No.2. Or does that include the "fruit in a basket showing thru", too?
I don't understand why anyone would object to No.1.
Where as No. 2 belongs in the tiolet!:Angry3:
Well Doc, I assume #1 - I like panty flashing / stocking tops - was in the poll - as for #2, we don't even allow that on this forum... so I doubt it would be that ;) I guess people shouldn't wear bikini's either then...
I my opinion, showing the tops of your stockings is very sexy, there are some fabulous legs here. And no I'm not suggesting that this site should condone anything more than that, but this does not constitute porn neither does glimpse of my panties.
Just my opinion ladies, don't crucify me.... I better get the nuns panties.
Rach
It is an interesting question, but I don't think there are enough responses possible. I like seeing the stocking tops and occasionally someone can take the photo that makes the panty-flash very becoming. If I tried either one I'd be embarassed and probably banned from the site. It's all I can do to come up with something that doesn't mock women when I take the photo, and thats the last thing I want to do.
Sure there is some sexuality involved, but tell me there isn't the same sexual intent in the photos we see so often with abundant (and dare I say inviting) cleavage! I can create an appearance of cleavage, but my panties are off limits! I must be one of the older group. Let me check, , , yep! I'm an old broad I guess.
It depends on the mood im in sometimes it can be nice to see the top of stockings in a pic it leads your mind to think about what else is underneath as for the panties when show doesnt leave enough to the imagination. if that makes any sence
I prefer not to see panties or stocking tops as I prefer to see girls looking as close as possible to RGs, & it's not very often, if at all, that you see RGs going around flashing their underwear.
You will not find any pictures with bits and bobs on this site. Pictures like that are removed very quickly.Quote:
Originally Posted by caroline anderson
That is an interesting question, not least because there is another thread running at the moment about GGs showing their bra straps and thong tops, which generally was deemed to be acceptable. A couple of decades ago showing a few inches of petticoat from the bottom of a skirt was high fashion. Most of this site is verbal and with careful monitoring, so it is not going to affect the general viewer's ideas about CDers one way or the other. As several have mentioned there are a number of other sites where CDers can 'flash' and there are a multitude of sites where GGs flaunt their nether regions in various degrees of cover. So if we want to dress the full fig we start at the very beginning and work our way up, just as GGs do, so what is different about pictures taken that 'reveal' what should be under the top dress? Obviously if the CDer is not well blessed then it will look more than tacky, and if displaying a blatantly non female piece of anatomy just repulsive, so just zap the file and move on. The impact on the general public is miniscule anyway and will not sway it postively if non revelation is made the rule.
Fi
i like just to see the clothes and not too see panties unless it look tastfull
Who you calling grandma :swear:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
I get the feeling that most of you do not mind seeing a GG in lingerie you just don't want to see a CD in lingerie. I would be interested in seeing how well CDs tuck, what style of bras and panties do you like to wear? Anyway, I have always liked lingerie. I used to buy Playboy's Lingerie magazine because I liked it better than the regular one. I am drifting away from the topic so I will try to get to my point. There is a lot of sexy lingerie out there, stockings are sexier than pantyhose, so why can’t a bit of it be shown from time to time. Yes, there is a tasteful way to show it, even for women. And you are talking like you have never seen the men’s underwear section of a catalogue and looked at his ‘package’. Well, their underwear is thicker than women’s. No kidding! I know this site is PG rated and I think it can remain so and still show stocking tops and partial panty exposure, as well as, a bit of lace here and there.
Bonnie
Either way is okay with me. Sheesh, how can we say we accept others for who they are otherwise? Besides some CD's are damn sexy looking.;):)
I love looking at CDs/Tgirls pics. Have to admit I surf thru the pics here and I look thru flicker a bunch. I can enjoy both sexy/naughty stuff or the more lady like pics. I would guess straight CDs probably don't get a kick out of a CD in lingerie and I understand. But some girls absolutely take my breath away!
Personally I have a few lingerie pics up on my flicker (R Rated at best) but I don't go totally crazy and post any X pics. Just save them for myself or very close friends. :daydreaming:
I don,t mind either way if the photo,s are tastefully done.
Sometimes a glimpse of stocking can make an otherwise average photo into a good photo!!
The photos i don,t like are the lunchbox squashed into panties ones and we don,t get them here anyway!!
i don't mind . but i can't pass if my life depended on it . so from my point of view i would never show pantie top to me that would be belittling gg's everywhere therefor i try for modesty if i am lucky i can get away with that ..
I like seeing lacy stocking tops when it is done in good taste. Lace is so femme!!
I think of it as another "accessory" to an outfit. If the outfit and "fit" and "fashion" isnt sufficiently sexy or erotic, then flashing/tops will flop...perhaps even be hopelessly crass.
:rose: Roberta :rose:
Well flashing stocking tops and panties in moderation is OK I suppose...I plead guilty as charged of having posted 1 or 2 pics in that vein on my Flickr site, but I don't make a habit of it.The main attraction in looking at photos of CDs is how passable are the others compared to yourself etc. There is a lot of emulation and friendly competition about it, plus the variety of looks and CDs with similar fashion tastes is fun looking at.
Most of the time the photos that are 'uncomfortable' are the ones where someone is trying to project all the things that men find sexy and doing it very badly because they still look like a guy in lingerie. If that's your thing then fine. But if someone can take a photo and it projects everything that men find sexy and looks convincing and stylish and captures that 'something' then that's a credit to their skill and expression of a sexy woman. I don't see any harm in that.
What a minefield. Unless this Site has changed it's rules, bikini's are in but undies or corsets are out. Mind you, saw a corset and stockings image yesterday somewhere here.
My interest is in displaying as female as possible in as many ways as possible which includes bikini's, undies and corsets. I consider these to be ultimate feminine images. I try and obliterate any sign of maleness down below. I don't condemn those that want to show their true sex but they should use Sites that permit it.
Gayle XXX
When out and about, you often see GG's flashing a bit of leg, stocking tops and sometimes even panties. We all look and enjoy that. What is the difference? I like it all!
Yes the site did change it's rules months ago... perhaps you should read them :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Gayle
Tamara,Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamara Croft
How did that guy steal my blue panty, at least he didn't get my pink one:D
There is likely a sexual link to what we do for most of us.
We are adults.
If you do not look, it won't bother you.
And if it does bother you, of what are you afraid?
To Group::love:
Imma tries to make the flashing stockings and girdle cuffs photographs so that objectionable items are absent. In short, Imma tries to make the photographs look like some shots of real GG wearing great looking stockings and firm control girdles.:battingeyelashes:
As the saying goes, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!:)
Since my wife continues to tell me that I have great looking legs, Imma just has to share the views with the world!:devil:
Go visit my Flickr album and see for yourself!:eek:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23704386@N02/
LOL:heehee:
Imma:brolleyes: