The other day I read and article in the NYTimes (I left a link in Media) that androgeny is rearing its head again. Burburry is no longer making trench coats for flashers but unisex panties instead. As the article points out, androgeny's new styles are for the young and slim. It's now acceptable in society (e.g. NYC?) for folks to dress androgenously/unisex. Older folks won't likely touch it with a ten foot pole. But, what happens to the crossdressing fashions of today, which a built on styles of yesterday? There are many here who enjoy corsets, garter belts, girdles, slips, dresses etc, but those largely went out of fashion in the 60's. We are the children of the 60's or earlier. If young cds are modelling their wardrobe on "yesterdays" that could mean short shorts, tank top, flip flops or skin tights and not much else. Nothing aesthetic or erotic there unless you count errant pubic hairs (even those are mostly gone) slipping past the inseam. My mother's lingerie style was certainly an influence, but also the "girly mags of the 50's and 60's, Playboy , Gurlesque (sic)stars like GRL and talent like Mamie van Doren, and later on, movies that dared to show the bare esentials and over the years, various books and the ubiquitous internet. Now, women like Dita von Tease make a good living doing retro burlesque and there are lots of softcore sites doing heels, panties, glamour etc. Where is the influence for the yound cds? Is it the internet? Is it their sisters? We don't here much from them as they seem to be locked in a closet elsewhere on this forum. The women I see where I live certainly won't be models for me or future cds if corsets, etc are the fashion de riguer of crossdressing. Does it make a difference? If we all wear unisex, crossdressing will be a tough act. Will there be other ways in which to express a feminie persona?
Mandrake out of water