Sorry,
I have to chime in here. There is a lot of misconception that acting "macho" or following stereotypical male roles/hobbies/interest precludes following more feminine stereotypical interests/roles/hobbies. In reality there is neither except the ones we create in our own minds. I engage in a lot of male oriented past times, I fix cars, do renovations, clear brush but then again so does my wife. I am a soldier and proud of that fact and have engaged in combat but then again I have fought along side female soldiers who hold their own and mix down and dirty with the guys including the proclivity to chew tobacco. It doesn't make them less feminine or me more masculine . . . they do it because that is what they wish to do as do I. On the other hand, I love to cook (always have), I sew, I help my wife clean the house (I truly love to vacuum as it relaxes me - love my Dyson) and I am not adverse to watching a good (heavy emphasis on the good) chick flick just as I enjoy a good zombie flick. All these so called feminine things (not convinced they are) I have done both "en boy" and on occasion "en girl" . . . they are the same as I am the same regardless of the gender I am presenting.
All this to say, do we really need to get wrapped around the axel on what constitutes feminine and/or masculine and how that influences a drive to present "en femme". Nobody can explain why I like to dress on occasion as a girl and I hardly believe it is because on some deep level I am tired of being a guy. Why? Because when I present as Isha, I am still me. I may not go to work "en femme" but Isha is still there. I may not cut the lawn in a skirt and heels but Isha is still there. I may decide to cook dinner "en femme" (as I did tonight) but boy me is still there.
My two cents.
Hugs
Isha