Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 76 to 89 of 89

Thread: CHANGE : It's time to de-demonize "tranny" term

  1. #76
    Gold Member NicoleScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    5,000
    The national pasttime used to be baseball. Now it's getting offended, or worse, being offended on behalf of others (offended by proxy). I have no objection to being called a tranny, TV, CDer, T-girl, or a sissy. But if you don't want to be called any of those, I wouldn't if I knew it would offend you. What I object to is the idea that if you don't like a word, nobody is allowed to use it, even to describe themselves.

  2. #77
    Banned Read only
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Western Washington
    Posts
    14,313
    "Tranny" is not different than any other word meant to describe a person; sexuality, nationality, ethnicity,etc. Used within the group it may be considered OK. Even used by someone outside the group it may be considered OK as long as it is a term of endearment. The "N" word comes to mind.

    So, if I were out and about in a dress, hosiery, heels, wig and makeup and I encounter a sister, dressed or not dressed, and, s/he says with a smile "You're a tranny, too!" I would not take offense. If I were to get a sneer and nasty words I would take offense due to the hostility displayed. It's the same with the usage of gay or lesbian.

    When there is universality against a word, such as the "N" word, then I would caution using it period. Usage of the "N" word within certain communities seems to be acceptable, but, it is also frowned on by everyone outside the community because it reminds people of societies once exploitation and denigration of a race. The word gay and lesbian has mixed reviews so far because there does not seem to be another word to explain the sexuality of the relationship. To me the term "tranny" has a negative connotation in society. Too many people are ignorant about the meaning of the term.

    Until I perused and then joined this site I only considered myself a cross dresser, not a "tranny." I, and, I mean I, do not consider myself a "tranny" or even "transgendered." Frankly, there are too many shades of grey in our world.

  3. #78
    *~Plain-Vanilla TG Girl~*
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    S.E. Georgia
    Posts
    1,075
    I generally only get offended if i sense someone is trying
    to be offensive....or condescending.

    My own little nag is i hate to be called "sweetie". But i get
    it all the time and i know it's intended fondly, so i accept
    it as intended.

    Words mean different things to different people, but it's usually
    pretty easy for me to tell if they're trying to be rude.

    If i came across a pink belt with "tranny" emblazoned in rhinestones,
    I'd buy it in a heartbeat...(and wear it too!) lol!

  4. #79
    Silver Member Tina_gm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,615
    I am in the crowd where an individual word is basically meaningless to me. Call me whatever you want. If you mean it harshly that is your problem and not mine. I am so sick of the political correctness you have no idea. It has moved us backwards by a long way, not forward. How is it forward when we are beginning to be afraid to talk to people at all in fears of offending them????? Our biggest national holiday is Christmas and yet many are afraid to say Merry Christmas.... this does not compute.....
    Chickens should be allowed to cross the road without having their motives questioned

  5. #80
    New Member transbetty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Czech republic, Prague
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimberly Kael View Post
    If you don't think any women are offended and quite willing to protest being called "chicks" then you're getting a rather limited perspective. It's not exactly a world-class insult, but it is somewhat dismissive. Many of the same women object to the term "girls" referring to mature women as well, and while I'm not nearly as sensitive I do understand where they're coming from.

    No, you get over it.

    See how compelling an argument that is? Expressing your opinion and suggesting to others you're sick of hearing theirs isn't likely to lead to meaningful change. I'm all for real exchanges of ideas, but that requires listening and trying to understand opposing viewpoints. Sure, some of it comes down to whether or not we agree that language is an effective agent for change. In practice, I think a lot of what happens is that terminology becomes a shorthand for identifying who hasn't been reached by education regarding the issues that affect a part of the population. The words themselves aren't hurtful, but the attitudes they represent certainly can be, so people change their language to show respect for the process of becoming a more understanding, diverse society. It's all too easy for people to assume that if the word tranny is still fair game, then the attitudes that have gone with it historically are still okay, too.[/B]

    I am irked by part-timers advocating for the use of terminology that has been used to degrade the entire trans community, because it's something a weekend crossdresser can just walk away from. They don't have to deal with day-to-day discrimination every day of their lives, in housing or at their job, so they don't pay the same kind of price transitioners, particularly non-passable transitioners, have to deal with.
    Maybe I was wrong in the way I put, I admit. It all depends on social settings, who says is it, what tone is used, etc. Even ladies do refer to themselves as "hens" sometimes and that's not meant to offend. Conclusion from my point: just ANYTHING can be offensive depending on settings. Can we agree on that? Now it's us who feels /decides what is an insult, isn't it? I know I'm here dancing on very thin thin ice, because it's very hard to detach yourself from denomination of spoken language, but it a "way out" of the inside-box-thinking.

    It's all the same game... Just think of it. In your reply you referred to me as "part-timer". Like someone who doesn't understand, because I don't live full time, I'm not a TS, (god knows why?). You see, that might be just another judgement you did without knowing me, not knowing what I went through in my life for being different. So did i get offended? To be sincere, first I did. But then I realize only if people stop being touchy a start to listen and open their mind for new ideas a change can happen.

    Quote Originally Posted by CarlaWestin View Post
    Personally, I'm only offended by context and intention.
    I can't say how much I agree with you. I think that's the main thing to address in this dilema.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lorileah View Post
    This is really a questionable thing to ask. You have to look at it from the perspective of the person being described. There are a lot of words, which people who are not in the group, think are OK to say. You don't use those terms especially around that group. "Tranny" is often used by non-TGs as a way to put down a person who is presenting as a non-same gender.

    You want something short and easy? How about "person" seems simple enough...interchangeable in every instance that "tranny" can be used, not and insult. How about we take the time to NOT say "let's use this word" and use that same time for just accepting everyone for who they are and not having to label them? Especially with a word that can be hurtful or mean.
    Many people here get my intention wrong and I have a feeling you demonstrated it. I mean positive sense, not as an offense (eye-opener). I'm not here to say what is right / wrong. I'm just suggesting "It's time to de-demonize "tranny" term". It's a discussion that can or may have not change anything. Maybe it will just leave few personal imprint memories. But if people agree it's a peaceful way for any change.

    Quote Originally Posted by janetcgtv View Post
    What's the problem. Each of us knows who we are. Some one in society does not tranny is an umbrella term which includes all types. I'm a non-op TS because of health and financial reasons Just because one doesn't have SRS that does not make them a non TS. Until some one gets involved with me they may only think I'm a tranny. Someone else is a cross dresser, until someone knows who they are they can call them a sissy(me as well) . Like someone said people want a simple term in dealing with a group while trying not to insult any one. When people get to know you as an individual they will want to use the terms which directly identify you.
    So please don't create a mountain out of a mole hill.

    It's just not worth it to hurt the feelings of a person who wants to know us.

    Take my Mom. When she found my cousins blouse in my closet . She said "that if I was born a girl , she would have named me Penelope".

    However my friends would have just called me Penny

    I find your reply up to the point and mature. THUMBS UP!

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulaQ View Post
    @Isha - you may think you've been called far worse than "tranny", but you really can't understand what those who use that word in anger mean until you've been chased by a group of angry men who mean to beat up the "big old tranny" they've run across.

    Or, how about this one? You are new in transition, and desperately in need of medical care your society denies you. You are trying to live your life as a woman, and you overhear the following: "hey, look at that tranny over there! Hey go over and talk to her, I bet you can get into her panties!" Followed by some F'n guy walking over and trying to grope you - as if that's the sure-fire way to get a date with a woman. But of course they've made it abundantly clear that you AREN'T a woman - you're a "tranny."

    I hope these little, real-life stories show how and why the term tranny is so hurtful to those of us who transition.
    From my personal view it's not the word that offenses you, but the approach of the person and what he thinks of you. In your example it was a guy who wanted to get into your panties. Sure his approach was not very "romantic", but the point where it hurts you (at least from what I understand) is you being sad because he doesn't see primarily woman in you + not behaving properly. So I'm saying it's us who reflects / reacts on outside world. And we (even myself) get hurt sometimes because we expect to be understood.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michelle789 View Post
    OMG you are soooooo right Paula. No where is safe if you're trans. Not even this forum. Not even your own transgender support group. In fact, the worst discrimination and worst treatment I have received has been from within the trans community.

    And it's not just physical safety. When you're trans, you can trust no one. Even other trans people stab each other in the back just to get power, to fit in with cis people, or to otherwise make themselves feel better. And trans people can be very condescending towards each other, as we have seen on another thread in the TS section.

    To a certain extent I also say that for women in general, cis or trans, no place is safe for them. Not even your own home when hubby might beat or sexually assault you.




    Another term I am not so fond of. Really, being T isn't anyone's damn business.

    As harsh as it sounds... While I do admit a TS person might be vulnerable to be hurt more (on multiple levels) , I think the victimization is a common problem. Michelle., I'm not saying necessarily it's your case. A man or woman. it's a dog-eats-dog world. Regardless of sex, race or bellief. What makes some people special in my humble opinion is ability to cope, survive and even learn and get stronger.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildaboutheels View Post
    Do you [you DO] realize I hope that SOME folks here like/want/use/need a label of some kind for themselves...

    And other folks DO NOT WANT to be labeled.

    Which folks are right?

    And which folks are wrong?

    Says who?

    There are folks right now whose biggest worry is that the Washington Redskins will have to give up/change the team name, [a name they have now used w/o a problem for XX years] because "some" people are offended.

    The trouble comes because most people are simply not able to separate what's important from what's not.

    On the other hand, I'll bet very few people [myself included] don't have at least a word or two that when heard, "agitates" them.

    I'm betting YOU have at least a couple?
    LOL, this one made me laugh. True, I agree that at the end this is not going to solve any TG issues. But, what I like it gives you interesting opinions, and even more after reading some replies and thinking them over it can expand your horizons.

    Quote Originally Posted by Katey888 View Post
    I think Kimberly is being misinterpreted now... she didn't imply part-timers (that's me - mos' def...) are lesser beings... she observed - quite correctly - that most part-timers are able to pick and choose where and when they do things en femme, thus being able to avoid times and places where real world stigma may come out in an insulting or damaging way... I have no qualms accepting that this is much easier for me to deal with than anyone going 24/7 - I have the deepest admiration and respect for all those that do and I think we should all try to understand how difficult it must be living with those potential slurs each and every day...

    On a serious note about labels - or communities of people, really.... Groups and their names are how we express commonality and solidarity towards those with whom we share something... It can be a family - it can be a tribe, a country, a football team... At some point - not dissimilar to the LGB community - we, however we want to define the we as a community, will have to be prepared to compromise our individual preference and bias and accept something that we can all feel a part of... If we are never prepared to compromise as individuals, we will only ever exist as a fragmented and fractionalised minority.

    Some of you probably don't care about that - but I think Betty started this with a perspective that says: if you refuse to be insulted by any particular name or description, then that name loses it's power - it's particularly powerful politically, if a group can reclaim that word for their own purposes, as has happened to a degree with the n-word.

    If people are not prepared to accept new or majority definitions, it probably doesn't hurt us individually, but it surely does make it harder to gain acceptance and understanding across the broader community... not that I expect we'll always agree on anything here, but wouldn't it be nice...?? Wouldn't it be a start...??



    Katey x
    Thanks katey, that sums it pretty well. A perspective from both sides (mine and for example Kimberly's) .

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephanie47 View Post
    "Tranny" is not different than any other word meant to describe a person; sexuality, nationality, ethnicity,etc. Used within the group it may be considered OK. Even used by someone outside the group it may be considered OK as long as it is a term of endearment. The "N" word comes to mind.

    So, if I were out and about in a dress, hosiery, heels, wig and makeup and I encounter a sister, dressed or not dressed, and, s/he says with a smile "You're a tranny, too!" I would not take offense. If I were to get a sneer and nasty words I would take offense due to the hostility displayed. It's the same with the usage of gay or lesbian.

    When there is universality against a word, such as the "N" word, then I would caution using it period. Usage of the "N" word within certain communities seems to be acceptable, but, it is also frowned on by everyone outside the community because it reminds people of societies once exploitation and denigration of a race. The word gay and lesbian has mixed reviews so far because there does not seem to be another word to explain the sexuality of the relationship. To me the term "tranny" has a negative connotation in society. Too many people are ignorant about the meaning of the term.

    Until I perused and then joined this site I only considered myself a cross dresser, not a "tranny." I, and, I mean I, do not consider myself a "tranny" or even "transgendered." Frankly, there are too many shades of grey in our world.

    Very good observation. It's happening right now for the term "tranny". That's how I feel. The more demonised, the more of T-word it becomes .

    BTW: I can you imagine this in near future:

    Person1: Have you heard about Mel Gibson saying the T-word on the national televison?
    Person2: Oh my god, really?
    Person1: Yes, without a shame. Poor guy, he doesn't know what's coming to him. I heard the T-people put an award on his head. He already can't enter some NY clubs for some T-word references.
    Person2: I would be scared, I heard these T-people are furious. Nails, scenes and everything ...

    Last edited by Raychel; 09-21-2014 at 08:41 AM. Reason: Consecutive posts merged - please use edit post to add to existing post rather than adding a successive post...

  6. #81
    The Mad Scientist
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Central Arkansas (((((((bang head)))))))
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Eryn View Post
    In many ways our GD is harder for us to deal with as we can't or won't walk away from the obligations entered into by our male selves. We end up living our lives as best we can on both sides of the divide , and it certainly isn't easy for us.
    .
    This is SO true Eryn! I have never had anyone out it out there like that. It is just as important as it's the same thing/feeling.

  7. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    South east MA
    Posts
    1,170
    Hey Girls, it could be worse, they could be calling us Nazi's instead!!

  8. #83
    Platinum Blonde member Ressie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    3,763
    The word seems to be mostly associated with porn. But as George Carlin said, words aren't bad per se, it's the context in which they're used. The way to take any offense out of words is to use them so much that the impact is watered down to hardly anything. So let's get started with it….

    I'm a tranny, you're a tranny, he's a tranny, she's a tranny, wouldn't you like to be a tranny too?
    "You're the only one to see the changes you take yourself through", Stevie Wonder

  9. #84
    Aspiring Member Samantha_Smile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Warrington UK
    Posts
    955
    Like a great many things, context is key.
    I'm all for the attitude of taking the power back and evolution of the species as a whole, so good on you for trying Betty!

    As I said, it's context. It's either a nasty slur or a term of endearment.
    "F**k off, you tranny B***ard" is obviously meant to offend/intimidate, and this context is out of line with me.
    But I would feel perfectly fine with someone referring to me as their "tranny mate" (UK - Mate = Friend), or even "that tall tranny".

    I wrote my first blog piece about this very topic http://sometimessamantha.blogspot.co...to-tranny.html
    And I would ask you to read it for a somewhat different skew on the issue,
    Samantha -x-

  10. #85
    Super Moderator Raychel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bangor Maine
    Posts
    40,055
    Personally I do not like the word Tranny, I wish there was some nicer term that we could use,
    my sister's reply when I told her how I prefer to dress

    "Everyone has there thing, all that matters is that you are happy, love what you do and who you do it with"

  11. #86
    Nondressing CDer ReluctantDebutant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    214
    I don't know the origins of "tranny" but I am sure it probably started as an abbreviated version of transsexual, transgendered, trans-woman, trans-man, and alike. Heck I hear every so often in reference to transvestites. I am sure it was used by everyone at first, by those in the community and those outside, as a nickname to keep from having to say all those syllables every time. Haters are going to use words with hate no matter what word you give them. You can continue to change the name but the haters are just going to adapt themselves. Change Trans-woman to Neo-woman or some such and in a few weeks you'll hear some ignoramus shout out "Hey look its one of those F**k'n neos over there".

    It just reminds me of when Transvestite was used in the 70's and 80's then people thought it was offensive and they preferred the term cross-dresser. Now I have read post here grumbling over the term cross-dresser. But if you think about it, transvestite is just Latin for cross-dresser, and any new would be just some variation. That word will get it abbreviations and nicknames and be used by people who hate and we'll all be back here again.

  12. #87
    Junior Member Melanie B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    71
    I get the feeling that "transvestite" is less acceptable in the US than in the UK. (don't know about other english-speaking countries!) It certainly wouldn't be the first time that the US and UK have been divided by their (superficially) common language.
    But I'm intrigued that we don't seem to have words to distinguish between those for whom cross dressing is primarily a sexual activity and those for whom it is gender related,, rather than sexual.

  13. #88
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    420
    I've found it soooooooooo much easier not to give a proverbial flying **** what label people apply to me! I do worry that nowadays people can be very tender and quick to seek offence, often where none was intended. I'm very happy being me and that's what I call me.

    P.S I have a gay friend who often asks how his "favourite tranny" is, I find it quite endearing!

  14. #89
    Platinum Member Beverley Sims's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Lowestoft UK. Beverley was here.
    Posts
    30,955
    Times, outlook, views and standards are constantly changing.

    Think of the terms used to describe coloured people years ago that were quite normal.

    They are considered offensive now and even get edited out of old films that portray racial problems.

    1940s cartoons made for children carried a 'G' rating,they now carry a 'PG' or higher rating.

    Political correctness has gone off the rails, although views about respect for women and those that are 'different' has improved.

    Smoking...... Need I say more.

    Tranny?

    Just live with it I say. It is not offensive, just feels that way to some.
    Work on your elegance,
    and beauty will follow.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Check out these other hot web properties:
Catholic Personals | Jewish Personals | Millionaire Personals | Unsigned Artists | Crossdressing Relationship
BBW Personals | Latino Personals | Black Personals | Crossdresser Chat | Crossdressing QA
Biker Personals | CD Relationship | Crossdressing Dating | FTM Relationship | Dating | TG Relationship


The crossdressing community is one that needs to stick together and continue to be there for each other for whatever one needs.
We are always trying to improve the forum to better serve the crossdresser in all of us.

Browse Crossdressers By State