I think Kimberly is being misinterpreted now... she didn't imply part-timers (that's me - mos' def...) are lesser beings... she observed - quite correctly - that most part-timers are able to pick and choose where and when they do things en femme, thus being able to avoid times and places where real world stigma may come out in an insulting or damaging way... I have no qualms accepting that this is much easier for me to deal with than anyone going 24/7 - I have the deepest admiration and respect for all those that do and I think we should all try to understand how difficult it must be living with those potential slurs each and every day...
On a serious note about labels - or communities of people, really.... Groups and their names are how we express commonality and solidarity towards those with whom we share something... It can be a family - it can be a tribe, a country, a football team... At some point - not dissimilar to the LGB community - we,
however we want to define the we as a community, will have to be prepared to compromise our individual preference and bias and accept something that we can all feel a part of... If we are never prepared to compromise as individuals, we will only ever exist as a fragmented and fractionalised minority.
Some of you probably don't care about that - but I think Betty started this with a perspective that says: if you refuse to be insulted by any particular name or description, then that name loses it's power - it's particularly powerful politically, if a group can reclaim that word for their own purposes, as has happened to a degree with the n-word.
If people are not prepared to accept new or majority definitions, it probably doesn't hurt us individually, but it surely does make it harder to gain acceptance and understanding across the broader community... not that I expect we'll always agree on anything here, but wouldn't it be nice...?? Wouldn't it be a start...??
Katey x