Jennifer I wasn't referring to how you present, using a female name in those circumstances is common sense.
I meant someone who is presenting more like a Transvestite where the inspiration for dressing is probably more sexual in nature and unrelated to any kind of female identity.
To use a female name seems a little disingenuous, if they want someone to better understand their 'category' (Tabitha's word) then the use of a male name kinda cements that they are still confident in their identity and therefore only the form of expression is relevant.
I don't know, I just wonder will the CD community ever have fair representation when even those who are strong in their male status hide behind a female name.
I'm just saying when those who say they don't wish to be considered Transgender how can they expect to be seen as different to being Trans when they hide within the binary rules?
I fully understand the need to remain hidden but in hiding within the binary as in blending or passing you will inadvertently be pulled into and contribute to the image of the TG umbrella.
Again not to target you Jennifer but you are quite secure in your male identity and sexuality
If I hadn't read your posts, by how you present and use of female name etc I would think you are definitely TG. This isn't an issue of course but if within yourself you only wanted to be viewed as a male CD then there would need to be some obvious claim on your gender when dressing.
The question in this case isn't particularly relevant to alot here it's really aimed at those who take issue with being considered Trans or under the TG umbrella. Although I'm not sure how many who feel like that are actually out and visible?