From the "For $35,000, you can be a girl in two months!" topic:
It sounds like you're implying that she shouldn't have had GRS, just because she isn't full-time. Well, what if she's happy the way she is, living between genders with a vagina? Before that, she was living between genders with a penis. Maybe she prefers having a vagina anyway.
Speaking more generally, what's wrong with having a gender role that doesn't match the genitalia, anyway?
Transitioned non-op M2Fs are essentially women with penises.
Transitioned non-op F2Ms are essentially men with vaginas.
I think that the RLT requirement may be somewhat flawed: It presupposes that in order for an M2F to be happy having a vagina, she must be comfortable full-time in a female gender role. This certainly isn't the case for transitioned non-ops, so it would be reasonable to assume that the opposite could be true: That there exists TGs who would benefit from SRS, but aren't full-time.