Hi,
I posted this on another forum and got a lot of responses. I thought the gals on this froum might have some interesting views too.
Dressing “age appropriate” seems to be one of the major CD rules for success. I have, however, often come across postings from CDs who at least at times like to dress a generation or more below their chronological age. I definitely fit into this category and have no problem doing so. I never dress in accordance with my chronological age. I like the feminine look of the “younger styles,” the short skirts and dresses and the brighter colors. I feel very much alive dressed this way and hence can express the vibrant female aspect within me.
I feel that the dressing “age appropriate” rule can be violated and can lead to a much fuller expression of our female aspect, which in the end result a major reason that we CD. Dressing in a way which best enables us to express our femininity in turn leads to greater confidence, and greater success. I cannot help but wonder if dressing “age appropriate” is actually a kind of straight jacket, needlessly limiting the satisfaction which CD should be giving.
One response I got was interesting:
Bottom line, I agree that it is important to dress age appropriate but if you can get away with showing a little more leg or a little more cleavage, why not?
Of course, as with all discusions on dressing, a great deal depends on the physical makeup of the person. This needs to be kept in mind in considering an answer to this question. I'm about 5'7 (156 cm), weight 130 lbs (about 60 kg) and have legs which are shapely, so I have been told at least, so in my case I can easily fit into clothes geared for the younger set.
The question is, how really important is dressing “age appropriate?”
Wishing you al the height of success,
Patricia