Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 87

Thread: How to tell if local laws against crossdressing?

  1. #26
    Member Veronica75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Outside NYC
    Posts
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah Charles View Post
    There doesn't need to be a law against crossdressing for Law Enforcement to make your day a real challenge. There are lots of very vague laws concerning Public Indecency, Public Disorder, Obstructing Justice, False Information to Police, as well as the need to determine if you are any kind of a threat to commit a crime. Officers have a lot of discression if they want to get involved in your life and you are in a public place.
    Sad but true. I have heard a local cop tell me, to my face, that if they want to they could take anyone into custody, anytime, there's always something they kind find as grounds. It wasn't said as bragging or to incite fear, just as a matter of fact, which made it all the more chilling.

  2. #27
    Senior Member Sally2005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    1,964
    I doubt it, but there might be laws against visibly stripping down or changing in your car or applying makeup while driving.

  3. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    50
    Not sure if I'd want to call up the police station. Contacting the ACLU or other organization is a good suggestion.
    I did run web searches against my city website (and the adjacent city's website) -- I didn't find anything posted about crossdressing. Of course, it might be enveloped in a broader law such as causing public disorder, etc.

    Of course, you have the men who dress in women's clothes, but as many of you know women wear men's clothing for work, comfort, and pleasure. These would include sports jerseys (i.e. football, basketball, Hockey, Baseball, etc, etc.), suits and tuxes, shirts, pants, construction uniforms, etc, etc, etc.
    Yes...it seems like there's a double standard in society. A woman can dress completely like a man, and little is noticed. If a man wear's a dress, it really attracts attention.

    Ya know, if there really are any such laws or ordinances on the books somewhere, I would really be interested in hearing about them.
    I ran across an article about a man in India being arrested for crossdressing, with an actual law forbidding it. Of course, that's in India, and not in Europe / the United States. There are probably several countries with laws against crossdressing.

  4. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sunny Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    1,603


    If there was such a law, the jails would be full of women wearing trousers/pants



  5. #30
    happy to be her Sarah Doepner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Utah, north of West Jordan, south of North Salt Lake & west of South Salt Lake
    Posts
    3,832

    No protection either

    In Utah the Legislature last year refused to allow a bill pass that included protection from eviction or from being fired from a job because a person is transgendered. Their story is "It's a slippery slope to where we are granting protected status to everyone when the laws are there already." However in this situation they just targeted transgendered people for discrimination without the protection or reasonable recourse. Can I call them idiots here or is that wrong?

    So, even if there are no laws against crossdressing, you do it at your own peril.
    Sarah
    Being transgender isn't a lifestyle choice. How you deal with it is.

  6. #31
    Silver Member trannie T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Northeastern California
    Posts
    4,234
    [QUOTE .However in this situation they just targeted transgendered people for discrimination without the protection or reasonable recourse. Can I call them idiots here or is that wrong?

    So, even if there are no laws against crossdressing, you do it at your own peril.[/QUOTE]

    It is wrong to call them idiots. To do so is an insult to all the decent idiots in the world.
    It takes a real man to wear a dress.

  7. #32
    Unexpected Woman Empress Lainie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    2,084
    The end of the first week after my transition to 24/7 female I got stopped for speeding in my pretty outfit and wig.


    My driver's license still said male and had my old male name on it. He made no comment whatsoever and treated me as he would anyone else. If he called me sir, I certainly couldn't object due to my ID. But I don't remember how he addressed me or if he used any pronoun.

    This is Las Vegas. The police are fairly trans friendly, but one would not use ma'am for my girlfriend and said he was only going by the ID which was still M.
    Last edited by Empress Lainie; 05-24-2009 at 09:33 PM. Reason: two words omitted
    [SIZE=2]Ascended Ancient[/SIZE]

  8. #33
    Member BillieJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    162
    I well remember the days when I would have to hide whenever I saw a patrol car coming down the street. Then most of those laws were deleted from the books. I well remember a few times in the early seventies reading in the paper where someone was arrested for 'impersonating a woman'. Then things seemed to change and we now have a lot more freedom to express ourselves. I pray that its going to get even better yet in my lifetime.

  9. #34
    Pantyhose forever! joann07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by dack View Post
    Not sure if I'd want to call up the police station. Contacting the ACLU or other organization is a good suggestion.
    I did run web searches against my city website (and the adjacent city's website) -- I didn't find anything posted about crossdressing. Of course, it might be enveloped in a broader law such as causing public disorder, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by joann07 View Post
    Of course, you have the men who dress in women's clothes, but as many of you know women wear men's clothing for work, comfort, and pleasure. These would include sports jerseys (i.e. football, basketball, Hockey, Baseball, etc, etc.), suits and tuxes, shirts, pants, construction uniforms, etc, etc, etc.

    Yes...it seems like there's a double standard in society. A woman can dress completely like a man, and little is noticed. If a man wear's a dress, it really attracts attention.
    Oh definitely.
    Women seem to get away with a lot of things nowadays when it comes to wearing clothes, but for men it's like a one way street.
    You can't go the other way because society says so.

    Hugs!
    JoAnn

    I love to see a beautiful woman in a nice dress, but then again, I also want to wear that dress.

  10. #35
    Bohemian Girl marla01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    83
    I'm surprised everyone missed this one...

    http://media.www.thenichollsworth.co...-2939242.shtml

    Note, for history buffs, the cops who were harassing drag queens that started the Stonewall Riots were using anti-crossdressing laws as justification.

    Marla

  11. #36
    Banned Read only
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,307
    A lot depends on what you are doing, and where. It also may depend on how you are dressed. Hanging out in parks is not a good idea, because of familys and children in the area. Dressing like a hooker, and hanging out is not a good idea. Wearing a dress and heels, and no wig or makeup is not a good idea. Disorderly conduct can be whatever a cop says it is. A little common sense goes a long way.

  12. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    410
    the only time you may get trouble is if commit a crime then you may be
    charged with wearing a disguise , so dont drink and drive

  13. #38
    Member Veronica75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Outside NYC
    Posts
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by marla01 View Post
    I'm surprised everyone missed this one...

    http://media.www.thenichollsworth.co...-2939242.shtml

    Note, for history buffs, the cops who were harassing drag queens that started the Stonewall Riots were using anti-crossdressing laws as justification.

    Marla
    "not becoming to his or her sex." ?!?

    That is so vague and all-encompassing as to be completely useless. One could argue that a loose t-shirt, frumpy work pants, and a gardening smock are "not becoming" to the female sex, or that a 1970's style electric blue polyester leisure suit is "not becoming" to the male sex (and in the second case, you might be right).

    I'm no lawyer, but it sounds pretty unconstitutional to me, and I'm sure all it would take would be one courageous test-case to knock the thing down.

    And, for the record, I think cocktail dresses and high heels are VERY becoming to the male sex!

  14. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,053
    Quote Originally Posted by Veronica75 View Post
    "not becoming to his or her sex." ?!?

    That is so vague and all-encompassing as to be completely useless. One could argue that a loose t-shirt, frumpy work pants, and a gardening smock are "not becoming" to the female sex, or that a 1970's style electric blue polyester leisure suit is "not becoming" to the male sex (and in the second case, you might be right).

    I'm no lawyer, but it sounds pretty unconstitutional to me, and I'm sure all it would take would be one courageous test-case to knock the thing down.

    And, for the record, I think cocktail dresses and high heels are VERY becoming to the male sex!
    Amen! I've half a mind to go down there dressed en femme, but only partially and sit in a park until arrested.

    Dress unbecoming to his or her sex? *drool* I'd love to try that in court!

  15. #40
    Swans have more fun! sandra-leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Canada
    Posts
    7,322
    Quote Originally Posted by marla01 View Post
    I'm surprised everyone missed this one...
    Already mentioned specifically in my earlier post in this thread, in which I summarized the results of an earlier thread I ran on this general topic in which I chased down some rumours and specific laws.

  16. #41
    ~Kapesh~ Trip_rockcity's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    South Africa ~ BRU!
    Posts
    57
    Hetic.. i best think twice b4 i pop down the shops.. great.. one more thing to worry about.. (^^,)
    ~xTx~

  17. #42
    Swans have more fun! sandra-leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Canada
    Posts
    7,322
    Quote Originally Posted by Melinda G View Post
    Wearing a dress and heels, and no wig or makeup is not a good idea. Disorderly conduct can be whatever a cop says it is.
    With respect: I consider the above to be "scaremongering". I also consider saying "Tell absolutely no one!" (a paraphrase of another recent posting of yours) to be "scaremongering". I appreciate that perhaps at some time some bad things might have happened to you, but your posts tend to adopt these position as if they were truisms, that if one does not pass perfectly that one should hide deeply in the closet.

    If it is true that "Disorderly conduct can be whatever a cop says it is", then the lesson that we should learn from that is not that we should hide: the lesson we should learn from that is that we should employ our democratic rights (those of us who live in places that supposedly have rights) and fight to curtail the power of the police to make arbitrary "disorderly conduct" decisions. And if we aren't willing to do that, then the preventive lesson to be learned is not cross-dressing specific the preventive lesson is that since ANYTHING could be "disorderly conduct", that we aren't willing to struggle for our freedoms, that we should, everyone one of us, "pure male" or whatever our gender indication, stay home inside, doors locked and shades drawn and stereo barely audible at best -- because, after all, a cop might decide that the way we hold the watering can to sprinkle our flowers is "disorderly conduct". When anything might be arbitrarily deemed disorderly conduct and we aren't willing to push back against that, then what you've done is internalized the idea that everything is "disorderly conduct" and they just haven't gotten around to tossing you in jail for the way that everything you do is messed up.


    If I recall correctly, I did get stopped once by a passing patrol car when I was walking down a side street in late dusk near where I live. I was new to the game, wearing an unfashionable dress, my lipstick was smeared, and I didn't have the hang of those shoes yet. My memory (not the greatest) is that one of the people on the street had reported me -- not for being a cross-dresser (or at least the police didn't mention anything about that), but because I was a stranger dressed a little more shabbily than would be typical for the neighbourhood, and the person had been concerned that I might be "casing" the neighbourhood. If there was any trans-phobia on the part of the neighbour, the police did not hint of it in any way: they were polite to me, explained clearly why they had stopped me, and upon hearing my explanation that No, I lived just a few streets over and was taking advantage of the nice weather to go for a walk, were completely satisfied. Before they left, they cautioned me to be a bit more careful walking alone at night on those streets, as the street lighting is weaker in the middle of the block and they had heard of random prowlers sometimes in the area, strangers from out of the area who come to our (better-off) neighbourhood and take advantage of "targets of opportunity" to mug people in the darker stretches.

    In the entire encounter, if there was the slightest hint on the part of the police about my cross-dressing being unusual, it was (at most) in the subtle reminder that as a mid-sized woman in heels, that the muggers would probably perceive me as more vulnerable than the muggers would tend to perceive a guy with a typical guy swagger. No condemnation or repulsion at all: at most a gentle guideance on smart safety for when I was out as a female.


    Now, if I were putting on "**** clothes" and going to hang around the area the prostitutes hang out, or putting on short party-dresses and no jacket and standing around on downtown street corners with a little clutch purse, not going anywhere, then Yes, of course I wouldn't be surprised if the police got the idea that I was there as a prostitute and stopped by to say something. But I have walked right by policemen (and women) while "gender-bending", obvious femme clothes but no wig and probably no makeup: if they glance at me at all (not uncommon, because police do routinely practice "situational awareness" and glance at people they pass to be sure there is no obvious threat) then they don't bother to look at me, break stride, or otherwise treat me any different from anyone else who is obviously just "going about their business". My wearing a skirt or a dress or pretty top or carrying a purse isn't a threat to anyone, and I'm not "moving strangely" -- if anything, they'd probably assess that I am less of a problem than the average person. Attitude: I act like I belong there, that my clothes are perfectly normal clothes, and, ergo, I do belong there. Except it isn't an "act" in the sense of a pretense: I'm comfortable being who I am, dressed as I am, and I just proceed normally, because it is normal for me.

  18. #43
    Junior Member denise413's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    47
    It is unconstitutional to have a law against cross-dressing as it violates your rights to free speech which includes freedom of expression. Unless the town wants to deal with a lawsuit backed by the ACLU, it would be unwise for any officer to press charges should a town ordinance exist. If a cop gives you a hard time about why you are dressed, get their name and badge number and file a complaint with the agency.

  19. #44
    fabmechanic featherelizabeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Colo. Springs, Co.
    Posts
    38
    Apparently still a law on the books in Pueblo, Colo. that requires CD's to "Wear men's underwear underneath their gear..." LOL!

  20. #45
    Banned Read only
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,307
    With respect: I consider the above to be "scaremongering". I also consider saying "Tell absolutely no one!" (a paraphrase of another recent posting of yours) to be "scaremongering". I appreciate that perhaps at some time some bad things might have happened to you, but your posts tend to adopt these position as if they were truisms, that if one does not pass perfectly that one should hide deeply in the closet.

    If it is true that "Disorderly conduct can be whatever a cop says it is", then the lesson that we should learn from that is not that we should hide: the lesson we should learn from that is that we should employ our democratic rights (those of us who live in places that supposedly have rights) and fight to curtail the power of the police to make arbitrary "disorderly conduct" decisions. And if we aren't willing to do that, then the preventive lesson to be learned is not cross-dressing specific the preventive lesson is that since ANYTHING could be "disorderly conduct", that we aren't willing to struggle for our freedoms, that we should, everyone one of us, "pure male" or whatever our gender indication, stay home inside, doors locked and shades drawn and stereo barely audible at best -- because, after all, a cop might decide that the way we hold the watering can to sprinkle our flowers is "disorderly conduct". When anything might be arbitrarily deemed disorderly conduct and we aren't willing to push back against that, then what you've done is internalized the idea that everything is "disorderly conduct" and they just haven't gotten around to tossing you in jail for the way that everything you do is messed up.
    First of all, nothing bad has ever happened to me[knock on wood], because I've always used common sense.

    Second, you go and fight the good fight, and get back to me on how it works out for you, and how much it costs in lawyer fees. If you go looking for trouble, you can usually find it.

    My point was that a guy in heels and a dress, and no makeup or wig, is more likely to attract unwanted attention, than the same guy in heels, dress, makeup and a wig, who is at least making an effort to pass. I really feel that if someone is going to dress and go outside, they should at least make an effort to pass, and not simply try to test the limits.

  21. #46
    Member Maxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    221
    Do a search on crossdressing law. There are many results both to protect, and, procecute crossdressers.

  22. #47
    Satans lil sister catriona36's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    sydney Australia
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by Suzy Harrison View Post


    If there was such a law, the jails would be full of women wearing trousers/pants


    Suzy i could just see the femanists having a ball with that lol

    I did, many years ago, get mail (snail mail) from a friend in BC Canada.. She stated that ( my memory aint the best but will try) "a friend of hers, dressed up as a woman with **** doing his makeup. said he was a good looking chick etc. walked into the local police station with a bunch of flowers and gave it to them to "pretty" up the place.."

    She said the station was full of cops and all was fine till he started to leave. Thats when he was proposisioned by one cop. said he identified himself to the cop as a man. and the cops said "yeah i know"

    he didnt get in any trouble but he did have to talk himself out of a date for that night lol

    now i know the words are not exactly as she said as it was a long time ago.. but you get the drift

    i remember cos she got busted for drunk in public, or what ever its called and she saw the flowers about 3 days later still there lol

    I would soooooooooooooooo never do that.. not out here anyway, too many places to hide my corpse lol

  23. #48
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    50
    I'm surprised everyone missed this one...

    http://media.www.thenichollsworth.co...-2939242.shtml

    Note, for history buffs, the cops who were harassing drag queens that started the Stonewall Riots were using anti-crossdressing laws as justification.

    Marla
    Hmm...for the article linked to above - For the crossdressing portion of the law - I wonder if they plan on convicting any women for dressing like men.

    A lot depends on what you are doing, and where. It also may depend on how you are dressed. Hanging out in parks is not a good idea, because of familys and children in the area. Dressing like a hooker, and hanging out is not a good idea. Wearing a dress and heels, and no wig or makeup is not a good idea. Disorderly conduct can be whatever a cop says it is. A little common sense goes a long way.
    To a reasonable extent this sounds logical to me. No, in theory, we shouldn't have to be afraid, but if you crossdress in a time, place, and manner that is likely to get people stirred up, you're probably going to get accused of some other crime (disorderly conduct, etc).
    I live in the conservative south - it would seem logical that I could get complaints / get stopped if I were in a park while dressed.
    Likewise overdressing and lingering or walking about areas you don't live could arouse suspicion.

    I'd be curious though on how likely you are to be cited for wearing a dress/pantyhose/heels without a wig/makeup to make it more believeable.

    Another question - While crossdressed, how would you know what stores you can visit without trouble? I understand busineses have a reasonable amount of freedom in asking people to leave / banning them.

  24. #49
    Skirtboy
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah Charles View Post
    In Utah the Legislature last year refused to allow a bill pass that included protection from eviction or from being fired from a job because a person is transgendered. Their story is "It's a slippery slope to where we are granting protected status to everyone when the laws are there already." However in this situation they just targeted transgendered people for discrimination without the protection or reasonable recourse. Can I call them idiots here or is that wrong?

    So, even if there are no laws against crossdressing, you do it at your own peril.
    They explicitly stated that the law was unneccssary because the group in question was already proteced by existing law and did not require seperate protection.
    I am straight.

  25. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Beaumont
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by Veronica75 View Post
    "not becoming to his or her sex." ?!?

    That is so vague and all-encompassing as to be completely useless. One could argue that a loose t-shirt, frumpy work pants, and a gardening smock are "not becoming" to the female sex, or that a 1970's style electric blue polyester leisure suit is "not becoming" to the male sex (and in the second case, you might be right).

    I'm no lawyer, but it sounds pretty unconstitutional to me, and I'm sure all it would take would be one courageous test-case to knock the thing down.

    And, for the record, I think cocktail dresses and high heels are VERY becoming to the male sex!
    It's Louisiana government. I live ten minutes across the boarder, and have family all over Louisiana. There is no more inept, crooked, and down right useless government than Louisiana's. Mayor Wonka(I don't remember what his name is......the NOLA mayor that talked about the chocolate city(thus mayor Wonka)) was probably as competent as any of them. You would have to see it to believe what Louisiana will pull. Great food, fun culture, but the inmates are running the asylum...

    Like his politics or not(which I'm not a huge fan of but...), Bobby Jindal is probably the least corrupt person to hold a parish level or higher office in 50 years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Check out these other hot web properties:
Catholic Personals | Jewish Personals | Millionaire Personals | Unsigned Artists | Crossdressing Relationship
BBW Personals | Latino Personals | Black Personals | Crossdresser Chat | Crossdressing QA
Biker Personals | CD Relationship | Crossdressing Dating | FTM Relationship | Dating | TG Relationship


The crossdressing community is one that needs to stick together and continue to be there for each other for whatever one needs.
We are always trying to improve the forum to better serve the crossdresser in all of us.

Browse Crossdressers By State