I like to think I am fairly intelectual individual, although such assumption tend to feel self righteous, so lets say I am an average in everything. I am reading the replies with utmost interest, because I in fact want to understand even if the subject at hand seems illusive at best.
But one statement, repeated often, contradicts statement's authors. Brandy this is not intended directly to you but you did state such statement as well, and so it goes:
[SIZE="3"]
"I should have and given the circumstances, would have if it only was 10, 20, 30, 40, 50+ years ago but I am content with what I have now and I feel no denial whats so ever"[/SIZE]
Now, in my understanding would have and should have indicates a NEED, but because of circumstances such need is stifled, sentenced, abandoned but you know as well as I, never forgotten. Other statements confess
[SIZE="3"]"if I only won a lottery things would had been different"[/SIZE]....Really!!! how different would they be???
I fail to understand this phenomena, and perhaps I am the one who does NOT understand, but in my book that is a definition of denial
PEACE
