Just so there is NO confusion...

[Tina B.]

I'm confused, this wife that is always ready willing and able, what type batteries does she take? Or do I have to move to Stepford, to find her. And ready for what, I ask you, Sex, Playtime meaning dress up, or ready to go out partying. And if you are talking about sex, do I have to be ready will and able all the time, not sure I could keep my end of that deal.
I think I'll go fix my make up jump back in bed, and take this question up with the wife, wonder who will holler Uncle first, or is that holler Aunt.

[sometimes_miss]

There have been threads about this before; and as I've mentioned before, when in a stable loving relationship, I rarely felt the desire to crossdress. During my engagement and early years of marriage, crossdressing wasn't part of my life, and I truly felt that I had 'beaten' it. Unfortunately, it was simply a case where, without much stress of other kinds in my life, I was able to suppress the crossdressing desire easily enough. Right now, I'm indulging in something similar. Low stress lifestyle, needs for affection dealt with and not put off. It's working, sort of, I haven't crossdressed since early May. The need for physical affection is filled mostly by visits to lapdancers when I don't have anyone to date. Expensive, but it's currently working. Well, that (cuddling up with an affectionate girl for a few hours, and a little alcohol) seems to hold me for a while.

[NicoleScott]

Yes, if "compliant" was added to "ready, willing, and able".

[Janet77]

Without divulging too much personal info, cross-dressing is just one of (too) many fetishes I have, so if I am getting one or more of the others satisfied, then I would surely dress less often. Also, if by "ready, willing and able" you mean ready to lie there motionless like a corpse while the man does everything, I think a lot of SO's are ready, willing and able...

[BLUE ORCHID]

Hi WAH, When a hobby becomes a job the fun goes out of it fast.

[anneob2002]

Yes. I would dress less. I don't think it would eliminate it, but it would be significantly less.

hey, I'm a guy - Many times dressing is just about taking care of the business at hand and if someone else was up to the job more often I would be less motivated to do what it takes to reach the promised land.

hehehe.... we seem to dance around the obvious so much here. So much so, that I though I was in the wrong place but I think it is just that the forum likes it to be less of a direct topic - not that theres anything wrong with that (jerry sienfeld reference) I know for some it is not the prime motivation for the activity we all share.

...I will be blunt.

IF YOU had a partner or SO who was ALWAYS "ready, willing and able", [for "playtime"] is it at least possible that you would "dress" less? Possibly a LOT less. Or maybe no affect whatsoever because you are not that kind of girl?

The key word here is POSSIBLE. And I will just assume that no one who responds has any reason to lie, and can ONLY speak for themselves.

[sandra-leigh]

I know for some it is not the prime motivation for the activity we all share.

I wrote above that Yes, I might have dressed less. But that was not intended to indicate that dressing was a substitute sexuality for me, just that the hypothetical sexuality would probably have confused me even more; such as "How can I be female if I enjoy this kind of sex?!?" There is a difference between what you want and what you can survive on for a time, and the hypothetical situation would possibly have extended the "survive on" time... but might have led to a sharper "collapse" rather than the more gradual transition I went through.

[Beverley Sims]

I would probably dress less as the forbidden fruit is now non existent.
I feel I have answered this thread before?
Sort of deja vu.