Nature vs Nurture? Is CDing genetic, or learned (or both!)
I was raised in a single parent home. Though my father and I have a decent relationship now, when I was growing up, he just wasn't in the picture. My mom did an excellent job of raising me.
I wonder sometimes if there had been a strong male role model in the house, would I be less likely to CD? Or (from the opposite spectrum) would I be more secretive/closeted/ashamed about CDing, but still feel just as compelled to do so?
I have noticed in myself that I have some mannerisms that seem feminine to me - just little things like how I hold a coffee cup or how I stand sometimes. Did I learn these mannerisms from my mom, or is it genetic? It's hard to tell.
On the flip side, I have lots of mannerisms from my dad as well, that are clearly not learned because I had no opportunity to learn them. They are purely genetic (it's actually kind of amusing sometimes how alike our demeanors are). That said, I can't discount entirely the nurture aspects either - kids learn tons from us.
Maybe what I need to consider is that, as I am neither 100% masculine, nor am I 100% feminine; so too is it with my parents. They are a mix of traits as well, and I was handed both M and F traits from each of them. Hmmm, I'll have to ponder that one (you may ponder with me).
-Retro
Nature vs. nurture, or both?
My personal opinion: both.
Speaking strictly of CDers here and not TSs, I think first there has to be a predisposition (nature) to explore it. Also I think that the method of exploration that is most significant, during the teenage years when it is intensely sexual (nurture) for most CDing males, causes some brain connections to be made that last a lifetime. It's almost like the intense connections that people make when they first fall in love. A bonding takes place that survives the test of time, even after all these intense sexual feelings about one another calm down after many years.
I've often wondered if the majority male CDers (and not TSs) who did not experience any sexual gratification over the dressing as teenagers/young men, if there would have been as serious an interest to present as a woman going into the later phases of adulthood.
On the subject of having some feminine mannerisms, this varies among people whether or not they feel the need to cross the gender lines. I know a female phys-ed teacher who is decidedly more on the masculine side in the way she walks, talks, and dresses, yet she is happy in her female gender. I also know some men who are more feminine in their absence of interest in stereotypical pursuits such as sports and cars, who care about the "finer" things in life, who even sit or manipulate eating or drinking utensils in the same way a woman might (maybe they are more dexterous or their mothers were rigid with table manners), yet they are solid in their male genders.
1 Attachment(s)
Your overlooking the obvious!
Neither. I think we were brainwashed! Yep, that's it. Because females mature faster than the normal male, they are obviously more suseptible to suggestion. Therefore it is MY conclusion that CD's/TS's fall into that same inteligent and faster maturity than regular males and therefore......... are more suseptible to. Ta Da. Figured it out.
I mean really, they got us coming and going. What little boy didn't want to be a fireman when growing up?
(Now, where did I put my tin foil hat?)