Originally Posted by
GeorgiaKat
I'd offer one thought: How are you going to measure perceived intelligence when all you have to go on are written responses to essay questions? Turing tests notwithstanding, perceived intelligence is going to be an extremely subjective observation, and one person's above-average will be another's just so-so.
Intelligence measurements are so controversial even when you try to use relatively standardized measures like SAT scores or percentiles from standardized tests, etc. There's raging controversies over cultural bias as to why white anglo-saxons will routinely do better than minorities and a large segment of the academe elite believe what we learn by association (ie, growing up in white suburban neighborhoods) and that gives us (yes, I'm white) an unfair edge on these tests.
So anyway, my point is, and please take this as an academic critique and not a personal slam, unless you've got a double-blind study to back the statement, I think it's unsustainable to make the statement that there's any correlation between cross-dressing (or any other activity) and intelligence.
And that's my .02