R U this kind of CD? R there many of us here with no "female side"?
After joining cd.com 5+ years ago, I read a lot about everyone's, "fem side". It all sounded so wonderful! I waited patiently and expectantly for my "fem side" to finally appear. But, after all these years, I've given up waiting for her to show!:sad:
Apparently, I am simply, "a man who likes to dress in women's clothes". I look at the woman I become in the mirror. And, I imagine what that image would feel like if I were her. But, ALL my perspective seems to be from a male's point of view! No fem views or feelings that I'm aware of.:straightface:
A recent thread asked how we, "---- CD's, embrace both our male and female sides"? Which seemed quite presumptuous to me. Because she assumed we all have both. Made me feel left out. Once again!
And, after some thot, that all sounds a bit more like a TS issue than a CD one to me?
I am the only one here that's not conscious of having a female side?:battingeyelashes:
I'm superman--does it matter that I'm schizophrenic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PaulaQ
But of course she can say that - it is one of the symptoms of gender dysphoria / gender identity disorder. I would presume that if anyone in the scientific community gave a damn, they could do scans of our brains, to see if the neurological activity followed similar patterns to those of a biological female, at least some of the time. That might prove or disprove it, or at least shed more light on the matter.
Don't you think it's pretty profound that it's easier to pump someone who's TS full of hormones, and perform cosmetic surgeries to alter their secondary sexual characteristics, than it is to treat their minds so that they feel proper in their birth gender? Doesn't this suggest there is something fairly profound going on in their brains? How can you be sure that it is so different?
One of signs (not symptoms) of GD could be saying that a persons thoughts are that of a woman--but that cannot be proven since the person has NEVER been a woman. There is no experience to compare. If you have never been to the moon, it is difficult to compare yourself to astronaut Alan Shepard who has. You can have thoughts that you SAY are a woman's thoughts but that doesn't make them so. claiming and being are two entirely different things. Otherwise I declare that I am now the president of the US.
something profound MAY be going on in the brain but according to whose definition? That there is clearly SOMETHING going on is clear, but science/psychology has yet to determine exactly what that is. One of the problems that I see, is that there has been little long-term scientific study and those studies that have been made have a small sample group as in the study Lucy Bella has quoted. The long-term heart studies involve several hundred thousand people, and go on for 10-20 years.
Though Lucy quotes a study that PROVES there is a difference, it actually doesn't. The author says:"Guillamon isn't sure whether the four regions are at all associated with notions of gender, but Ivanka Savic-Berglund at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, thinks they might be. (bold is mine). Thiking something might be, and being scientifically proven are worlds apart.
further :" "People may experience early or late onset of transsexuality and we don't know what causes this difference." this seems to negate the entire brain scan thing.The scans were post-mortem (e.g. the people were dead) so changes in body tissue have to be accounted for and as stated "But the region is too small to scan in a living person so differences have only been picked up at post-mortem."
I'm not denying that some children see themselves as opposite of their birth sex (brain chemistry , epigenetics likely and more) , but I'm not certain how this plays out when all of a sudden a person of 40 or so all of sudden decides they are TS. There is so much experience over 40 years of so that psychology is going to play a larger role that it would for a 5 year old.
I am not an expert in this subject and have no degrees in science but I do read the literature, I have thought about this issue and just general consideration of the human mind and it's infinite adaptability warns me away from any certainty. In math there is certainty. Part of what I see is that we are able to talk ourselves into almost anything. We're beautiful, we are better looking than the woman we model ourselves after, we will live forever, etc. If a person wants to live their life dressed as a female and present themselves to the public as such, fine, but there is no need to rationalize that.
Some people say they are a woman trapped in a man's body, but how can one say that never having had any experience to compare to make that statement.?
Is it just the logical thing to say because woman is opposite of man? Isn't it better to say I have confused feelings and thoughts. Several studies I read recently suggested that the "true" TS is very small in number like 1% of all people who think they are TS and it is irreversible and you really have to hate your genitals.
I recommend reading Thomas Nagel's paper (it is only 4 pages) entitled "what i it like to be a bat" here
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...t-is-it-be-bat
click on the blue text philosophy paper when you get to the link.
'