What's with the sudden labeling of crossdressers without a feminine identity as "Hell No" posters? I never responded as such, but rather simply identify myself as a pleasure dresser, not a feminine identity dresser. "Hell No" seems to indicate some sort of defensive response to a false assumption or accusation, like "Hell No, I'm not gay", or "Hell No, I'm not a Republican". For me, it's just "as a matter of fact, I dress for pleasure, and not driven by an internal feminine identity".
I'm not sure what the OP had in mind. I could be wrong, but I sense the OP's presumtion that the highest calling of crossdressing is having a feminine identity which justifies a female name, and that those with a lesser calling, like dressing for pleasure, ought to stay private and need no female name. Sorry to disappoint you. Many have given good reasons.
