What I do not get is this apparent need to transpose one "taboo" subject [Bisexuality] on top of the other [CD'ing] in order to somehow justify it by saying the second [Bisexuality] is only present when the first [CD'ing] is.
In English:
What is so inherently wrong with wanting to take part in a Bisexual encounter.
Why the need to use Cross dressing as a crutch to justify it.
Is there something so wrong with wanting to take a [male] sexual partner that it can only be [mentally] done while under the guise of being thought of as a woman?
Granted there is more of a stigma regarding males being Bisexual then there is for females. Reflected in the fact that more often then not males are less willing to openly admit being Bi.
Why not just get past the BS, cut out the middle man and get straight to it.
Why dress when ultimately once the clothes come off the end result is the same as above.
Doing this seems to marginalize the act of dressing to mere role playing and costumes.
The above is in no way meant to encompass all CD'ers or Bisexual acts.
Warning: This post may contain up to 63% post consumer recycled Sarcasm ... or Peanuts." 
