Thanks all of you for responding - just a few quick comments
Rhonda - I agree. There is a continuing swell of liberality that I can sense and these perspectives are becoming more widespread - barring any extremist backlash, I can only see that continuing.
Ineke - that's interesting... I wonder if there's a real, physiological difference there? Perhaps up close we respond subconsciously to pheromones as well as halitosis..?
Great points Kendra - thanks. The more I think about this and see what other folk have experienced the more I have begun to appreciate sexuality and gender as a continuum and not a binary, or ternary, spectrum.
Susan - that is a really well made point. How many husbands (and vice versa!) have been hooked by an illusion only to have that dissipate once they've been married for a while. We have an ability sometimes to see things as we want them, rather than as they really are. But isn't that also the secret of some our own alter egos too?
Mink - that's a really honest view, thank you. And for me that's also supporting the view of both a continuum of gender AND the fact that real relationships are about more than just physical compatibility.
Katie R - thanks for that link - believe it or not I had searched for topics like this but came up with a blank -I guess I have to improve my search skills- there are a lot of pertinent points on that thread too and makes interesting reading.
Isha - thanks for that further insight around relationships. Reminds that recently a young British athlete (Tom Daley -High diving) came out and revealed that he was in a relationship with another guy but was equivocal about actually being gay. He really focused on the emotional relationship rather than any physical attraction, which supports your final point. And actually that was Wilde's defence (the title line some may have recognised from Lord Alfred Douglas' poem) in that famous court case.
For me, it's just underlined how important it is that we don't jump to conclusions about our own or others sexuality nor expect there to be any answers or blinding insights that provide any definitive categorisation (Ahh.. yes, Mr G, you're a Cat. 3.iv(f) lingerie CDer ...) - just makes for a more interesting world I suppose - and some continuing headaches for those of us who can't resist thinking about this stuff.
Thanks again girls - Katey x