Enforcement

[heatherdress]

No, in effect it is. Anti-discrimination statutes of this type protect the stated constituency, and by extension, also those who are perceived to be of that constituency. In this case, a genetic woman was perceived to be transgender.

DeeAnn

DeeAnn - You miss the point. Most significant is the fact that Detroit has a very strong gender-related anti-discrimination law - and this happened anyway. And Detroit does not have a bathroom restriction law - and this happened anyway.

Seems to represent an answer to bot enforcement and effect of these laws, both protective and descriptive.

Also, it is another example of misinformation. This unfortunate woman is a GG female, not a transgender person. And she was not arrested.

Manipulation of information on both "sides" promotes unnecessary fear and unfortunate ill-will.