Krystalina,
Sometimes you have to make it known that the media isn't considering minority groups.
About a year ago the Moneysupermarket ads started running with a guy wearing heels. You would think no harm being done, but I was going through a bad patch with my wife and the last thing she wanted to see was a guy crossdressed in heels doing a provocative dance . The series have moved on through several editions but it is wearing thin now, I began to think about the various parties that may be struggling with TG issues. Parents with children with identity problems, couples like me going through a bad patch ,couples who have separated or divorced, and a husband who has finally decided he's TS.
We do have a voice so I used it and Emailed the Advertising Complaints Commission , I outlined the problem and then questioned the validity of the contents of the ad to the product being sold. I did get a very nice reply back which basically said the ad agency hadn't given it a full enough thought and had failed to contact relevant TG bodies to consult them. They have now done this but decided that the series of ads hadn't contravened any basic rights, and as the majority of the public hadn't raised any complaints no further action would be taken.
After a few weeks I received another Email from the authority that oversees the Ad Agency saying that they felt the decision was borderline and asked me to fill in a full questionnaire, they also asked if I was prepared to be interviewed if necessary. That put me in a spot, I felt strongly about it but was concerned that although my wife didn't like the ads she may not be happy about me voicing an opinion on behalf of the TG community. I decided to still tick yes, they are offering me the right and chance to speak up for others, I may not get the opportunity again, the minority shouldn't silently always have to give in to the majority.