I quoting part of this thread to give context.
Marina said...
I replied...
Laura wrote
I didn't say "total BS" and I said it response to Marina's insinuation that it is a hypothesis that applies to trans people.
Based on your description?
I think you are red-blooded, heterosexual MAN who has found a healthy view and outlet from wearing women's clothing. I don't think you're transgender or even close. I think imagining yourself as a woman and dressing as a woman gets you sexually aroused. But given what you wrote above... I truly believe you're a heterosexual, cisgender man.
Transwomen are not men. Some... some, for various reasons may have some male anatomy but they are not men. AND... if a transwoman gets sexually aroused it isn't because of the flawed nature of Blanchard's hypothesis.
There are a lot of articles written on the subject in support of and against.
There is an unfortunate lack of study on trans folks in general however, the idea of AGP as it was applied to trans women has been disproven through critical thought, logic and reason countless times.
Here is a really good article (albeit, quite long) on the subject.
Making sense of augtogynephelia