So if I understand what you are saying, the two people you were following behind didn't do anything wrong. It was you who drew the wrong conclusion.Homophobia is alive and well. At least that is what I hear you saying. Forgive me if I am wrong. We seem to be hitting reoccurring theme here that society's opinion is based on a lack of or flawed knowledge.I agree with you. Still it is sad that people feel that they have to judge others at all.
But why are such things taught in the first place?
Succinct and to the point.
I'd like to believe this is true. But there is evidence to the contrary. On this forum alone there is account after account of partners purging their clothing at the insistence of their SO or other family member. And as to relationships being based on a potential partner being a certain gender, I would suggest it is not so gender based as it is sexual based. The desire to procreate is a strong driver. Having a same sex partner (or one who is perceived to be the same sex) complicates the process.
Just what makes these gender roles "essential" and who made that determination? If women have been able to accomplish this, what is holding men back from doing the same thing?
Another vote for inadequate or faulty education of the masses! [QUOTE=sissystephanie;2396149]...Women wear mens clothing all the time and no one seems to care, so why should men be different!! The only reason is just because they are MEN!! We are special, at least in the eyes of some people!!...Men are special? I'd like to hear more from you on this. It has been my experience that the woman was the one to be protected and cherished.
Wouldn't it be interesting to know why some of these societies developed not only a tolerance for cross dressing but in some cases, a whole-hearted enthusiastic support of the practice?Actually physics is very physical. By definition it is the study of all the physical things that make up the universe. But your "red light" point is well taken. We are programmed to accept certain things and reject others. I guess the question now becomes what basis do we use to make those judgments?
This thought opens up a whole bunch of cans of worms! What are these guidelines? who established them? Why are we bound to continue them?
Here again, we are suggesting a lack of knowledge or understanding. Denise, would you care to comment further on the statement, "some folks who do CD are accepted by others for who they are as a person?" This may be one of the missing keys.
So you see it as a matter of individual prejudices?Even though they have never interacted with such and individual. They had to get that preconceived notion from somewhere.You and Denice seem to be on a similar wavelength.
Lexi, I have been around this forum for quite some time now and certainly longer than you. The thread you referenced is not the same as being asked here. GG's have plenty of reasons to reject cross dressers and not all of them relate to the act of cross dressing itself. What I am trying to get at is why the act of cross dressing is thought to be a wrong thing to do. What I'm hearing most is that it is because it is not understood. That in and of itself is understandable because many (most?) of us struggle to understand it ourselves.
We seem to keep circling back to society's "norms." Perhaps we need to have a better understanding of who establishes these norms and approach the issue from that standpoint.
This is a great discussion and I appreciate everyone's participation. I look forward to some of our Loved Ones joining in as well.