I take it from that statement that you consider any infdertile woman to only "appear to be a woman", and what about someone who has had to have a hysterectomy. Again by your definition, se is not a woman. Get real.
The common cry of most of your fellow haters.
Does this mean that if he was unable to far=ther children you would not consider him to be a man? I think you need to get some professional help to flush this bigotry out of your system.
All that she needs to tell him is that in common with about 1 in seven other women she is unable to have children.
Your above responses show your point of view very clearly. You consider that anyone who cannot procreate is not a man or not a woman. As to whether our arguments "qualify" - luckily it is not the bigots who get to decide this.