No, the topic starter ultimately seems to talk about crossdressers in general, not the particular subset on crossdressers.com, and so are many respondents, but I may be wrong.
I don't really have to. Let's look at the inverse statement: "the community on crossdressers.com is representative of the general crossdressing population". It's technically possible, but what would be the odds that a non-random selection of people who are tech-savvy enough to voluntary join this particular English/American website and are hanging around long enough to create all those fluff topics is representative? That seems unlikely, so perhaps I should have said "I seems unlikely that..etc. etc.", but I deemed that rather unnecessary. Anyway, disregard my statement if the burden of proof is on me.