Quote Originally Posted by MissConstrued View Post
At no point is anyone obliged to tell anything they don't wish to. Wisdom dictates that one's future spouse should know, however, though I deem it simpler to show rather than tell. In other words, I don't come right out and say it, but I don't hide it either. Show a hint here and there (nail polish, wear panties, etc... lol) and women will clue in. But making a "confession" of it gives the wrong impression.
What about say someone with an STD being obliged to tell a sexual partner before having sex that they are say, HIV Thats the law in many places.

Bosses... absolutely not. What an employee does on his own time is none of his employer's business. Period. Drug testing that is not specific to whether the employee is under the influence only during work hours is already crossing the line.
And yet some bosses do fire people for 'bringing the firm into disrepute' or the like.

I haven't even bothered to look into this ENDA thing you're on about, but I suspect it's yet another pile of legalistic excrement designed to further tie the hands of employers in the name of some more of your imaginary "rights."
It merely says you cant fire people for being a CD or gay etc. Those laws already exist for race and religion etc, this merely covers us as equal to christians and jews.

Boiled down, and simply put: if, for any reason, you need your job protected by law, you're f***ing incompetent, and should just get a federal job, where incompetence is the status quo.
You think Diane Schroer wasn't the most qualified person for the job and was somehow incompetant?