My liberal wife thinks all TVs are gay

[ReineD]

When I first considered having physical intimacy with men, a fascinating thought occured to me. That was I could choose to be the active partner or the passive partner or move back and forth as I saw fit. I chose to be the passive partner and that opened up a distinctly new train of thought. It was a very different way of looking at sexual dynamics and it fascinated me. It was completely unlike the rigid behaviors that I had assumed were appropriate. That new freedom can be intoxicating. Further, if approached correctly, there is no reason that a gay relationship has to look like an opposite sex reltionship. You don't necessarily have the preset expectations (wife does this, husband does that) that you would see in many opposite sex couples.

At the risk of beginning another debate in this thread, why do you think that a hetero sexual relationship necessarily involves one passive and one active partner? Aren't both partners effectively active? Without becoming too graphic, couples do things mutually, they take turns doing things, and there are lots of different positions to do them in plus couples can add spice by using a variety of things purchased in stores for sexual enhancement?

Also, doesn't the intoxication come with the person that you are with? For me, great sex happens when I'm very much into the person in all levels: physically, emotionally, and intellectually. Adequate sex happens when only one of the three is present. Generally, I think that GGs feel a holistic attraction to a person is more intense than just being attracted to one thing. I don't think we compartmentalize sex like men do. This might be why I defined bisexuality differently than Katey888 earlier.

I know this is not a proper study and of course there are exceptions, but this article expresses my point in more detail:
http://www.netnanny.com/learn_center/article/165/